Patreon's co-founder reflects that early-stage leadership requires gathering diverse opinions. However, as the business and founder mature, it's crucial to shift from operating by consensus to using one's own internal conviction as the North Star for decision-making.

Related Insights

Brian Halligan reflects that as HubSpot grew, he was coached out of his natural 'founder mode' instincts (e.g., many direct reports, public feedback) and into conventional 'manager mode' (weekly one-on-ones, private criticism). He now regrets this shift, believing his initial, more unconventional approach was more effective.

Waiting for perfect data leads to paralysis. A core founder skill is making hard decisions with incomplete information. This 'founder gut' isn't innate; it's developed by studying the thought processes—not just the outcomes—of experienced entrepreneurs through masterminds, advisors, or podcasts.

Managerial companies derive legitimacy from "the plan," creating enormous inertia against change. In founder-led companies, legitimacy is vested in the founder as an individual. This is their key structural advantage, allowing the entire organization to pivot on a dime based on conviction.

When a founder advises a successor to 'make decisions that energize you,' it's a strategic directive, not a wellness tip. It serves as a guardrail against the 'death by a thousand cuts' that comes from compromising core beliefs just to make others comfortable, thereby preserving the vision.

A successful startup often resembles a cult, requiring a leader who communicates their vision with unwavering, first-person conviction. Hiding the founder behind polished PR spokespeople is a mistake; it neuters the contagious belief required to recruit talent and build a movement against impossible odds.

Jack Conte advises that trying to appeal to everyone results in appealing to no one. Founders and creators who are fearlessly themselves, even if it polarizes some, build the most rabidly loyal communities because they sound like real, relatable people.

Instead of escalating disagreements, Atlassian's founders operated on a simple principle: if one couldn't be persuaded that an idea was good, it was likely not worth pursuing. This served as a critical decision-making filter and prevented major conflicts.

Jason Fried advises founders facing inflection points to trust their own instincts rather than seeking external playbooks. An outsider can't replicate the founder's deep, irreplaceable knowledge of their business's history and decisions. The only path forward is to continue "making it up" based on that unique context.

Bumble's founder believes the initial, all-consuming obsession is critical for getting a startup off the ground. However, this same intensity becomes a liability as the company matures. Leaders must evolve and create distance to gain the perspective needed for long-term growth and to avoid stifling opportunity.

Founders remain long after hired executives depart, inheriting the outcomes of past choices. This long-term ownership is a powerful justification for founders to stay deeply involved in key decisions, trusting their unique context over an expert's resume.

Effective Founders Evolve from Seeking Consensus to Trusting Their Own Conviction | RiffOn