Using a mythological framework, founders are not the dutiful, rule-following 'Ram' archetype. They are 'Krishnas': driven by strong core values but willing to bend or break conventional rules to achieve their mission. Dutiful 'Rams' are better for scaling a company, not starting one.
Related Insights
Founders often fall into damaging extremes. Some constantly chase novelty and never commit, while others cling to their comfort zone (e.g., coding) and neglect vital business needs like sales. The goal is to find a balance, pushing boundaries when necessary but also focusing to execute.
The startup world over-indexes on the aggressive, relentless founder archetype. Spotify CEO Daniel Ek argues for the need to recognize and promote alternative models. Success doesn't require emulating a single personality type; it requires building a business that is authentic to you.
The ancient text teaches a core principle for founders: you must work with the utmost intensity and care, but you must not be attached to the result. This mindset helps manage the stress of a startup's inherent unpredictability, acknowledging that you cannot fully control the outcome.
Seneca's founder turned down lucrative offers to run larger companies. For him, the unique, "insanely gratifying" value of founding is the ability to create the mission from scratch and dedicate his life force to a specific desired change in the world, a power not available in an existing CEO role.
Spotify's Daniel Ek argues against the myth of a single founder archetype. Instead of imitating famous entrepreneurs like Steve Jobs, founders should focus on self-discovery to build a company that is a natural extension of their unique personality and leadership style.
A successful startup often resembles a cult, requiring a leader who communicates their vision with unwavering, first-person conviction. Hiding the founder behind polished PR spokespeople is a mistake; it neuters the contagious belief required to recruit talent and build a movement against impossible odds.
In school or corporate jobs, the 'rules for success' are provided. Founders enter a world with no such rubric and often fail because they don't consciously develop their own theory of how the world works, instead defaulting to shallow, unexamined beliefs about what founders 'should' do.
Success stories like Notion's cannot be replicated because they are a direct result of their founder's unique personality and 'narrative violations.' Great companies succeed based on the specific, unrepeatable idiosyncrasies of their founders. The key is to embrace these unique traits, not follow a generic playbook.
Beyond table stakes like hunger and vision, the most successful founders exhibit deep empathy ("people gene"), curiosity, and high emotional intelligence. They are secure, know their weaknesses, and often have a background in team sports, understanding that company building is a team effort.
Some founders are not driven by a specific mission but by a personality that makes them unsuited for traditional employment. A high sense of self-worth and an inability to submit to authority can be a powerful, if accidental, driver of entrepreneurship.
