The common stereotype that Gen Z employees lack work ethic for leaving at 5 PM is often a harmful misjudgment. One example cited an employee who left on time to work a second job and care for a parent with stage 4 cancer. Leaders should get curious about external pressures before assuming laziness.
Related Insights
Due to demographic shifts and a post-pandemic re-evaluation of work, employees now hold more power. This requires a fundamental leadership mindset shift: from managing people and processes to enabling their success. High turnover and disengagement are no longer employee problems but leadership failures. A leader's success now depends entirely on the success of their team, meaning 'you work for them'.
Today's leaders are expected to manage employee emotions and take public stances on social issues, roles for which their traditional training did not prepare them. This requires a new skillset centered on empathy and public communication to build trust with a skeptical younger workforce.
Yamini Rangan pushes back against the pressure to have impressive hobbies, sharing that she focused on being a present mother and excelling at work. This offers a validating perspective for ambitious professionals who prioritize core life areas over developing external interests.
Young employees' perceived lack of resilience isn't a generational flaw but a result of parenting that shielded them from hardship. The decline of teenagers working difficult, blue-collar summer jobs has created adults who are less prepared for the realities of the workplace.
Tim Elmore's "Peter Pan Paradox" posits that Gen Z can seem immature (tragic) while possessing intuitive authority on culture, AI, and social media (magic). Leaders must look past their unpolished exterior to leverage these valuable, forward-looking insights that don't depend on a formal title.
Managers misinterpret Gen Z's demands for flexibility and rapid promotion as laziness. In reality, new income streams, like earning $50,000 a year from TikTok brand deals, give them unprecedented leverage and options, forcing a necessary evolution in management and retention strategies.
Gen Z employees often possess innate authority in modern domains like AI and social media, yet they may lack basic professional maturity and emotional skills, partly due to the pandemic's impact on their development. This paradox requires leaders to coach them on fundamentals while simultaneously leveraging their unique, future-focused insights. Leaders must listen more and coach more.
To give corrective feedback effectively to sensitive Gen Z employees, leaders must first connect before they correct. The ALEG method provides a four-step process: Ask questions to understand their perspective, Listen intently so they feel heard, Empathize with their situation so they feel understood, and only then Guide them. This approach earns the right to lead through relationship, not authority.
When you have the freedom to take a lunch break, ask for help, or log off on time, you have a responsibility to do it. By resting, you normalize these behaviors for other women and team members who may not feel they have the same permission. Failing to rest perpetuates a culture of overwork, whereas modeling it creates a subtle but powerful cultural shift.
Before labeling a team as not resilient, leaders should first examine their own expectations. Often, what appears as a lack of resilience is a natural reaction to systemic issues like overwork, underpayment, and inadequate support, making it a leadership problem, not an employee one.
