Contrary to popular belief, earnings growth has a very low correlation with decadal stock returns. The primary driver is the change in the valuation multiple (e.g., P/E ratio expansion or contraction). The correlation between 10-year real returns and 10-year valuation changes is a staggering 0.9, while it is tiny for earnings growth.

The case of Netflix in 2016, with a P/E over 300, shows that high multiples can reflect a company strategically sacrificing short-term profits for global expansion. Instead of dismissing such stocks as expensive, investors should use second-order thinking to ask *why* the market is pricing in such high growth.

Over the long run, the primary driver of a stock's market value appreciation is the growth in its underlying intrinsic value, specifically its earnings per share (EPS). This simple but profound concept grounds investing in business fundamentals, treating stocks as ownership stakes rather than speculative tickers.

Counter to conventional value investing wisdom, a low Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratio is often a "value trap" that exists for a valid, negative reason. A high P/E, conversely, is a more reliable indicator that a stock may be overvalued and worth selling. This suggests avoiding cheap stocks is more important than simply finding them.

The classic 'margin of safety' isn't limited to tangible assets. For modern, asset-light companies, safety is found in predictable, high-growth earnings. A business with strong earnings visibility, high switching costs, and rapid growth can have a massive margin of safety, even with a high price-to-book ratio.

Traditional valuation multiples are increasingly misleading because GAAP rules expense intangible investments (R&D, brand building) rather than capitalizing them. For a company like Microsoft, properly capitalizing these investments can drop its P/E ratio from 35 to 30, revealing a more attractive valuation.

Stocks with the strongest fundamentals (top dog, sustainable advantage, great management) are often labeled "overvalued" by commentators. Gardner argues this perception is actually the ultimate buy signal, as the market consistently underestimates the long-term potential of true greatness.

Financial models struggle to project sustained high growth rates (>30% YoY). Analysts naturally revert to the mean, causing them to undervalue companies that defy this and maintain high growth for years, creating an opportunity for investors who spot this persistence.

Investors instinctively value the distant future cash flows of elite compounding businesses higher than traditional financial models suggest. This phenomenon, known as hyperbolic discounting, helps explain why these companies consistently command premium multiples, as the market behaves more aligned with this model than standard exponential discounting.