We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.
Unlike previous trastuzumab-IO combinations that harmed PD-L1 negative patients, the zanidatumab-IO regimen benefits HER2+ patients regardless of PD-L1 status. This is likely because zanidatumab is a more immunogenic molecule, potentiating the checkpoint inhibitor's effect even in a less inflamed tumor microenvironment.
The rationale for combining ADCs with checkpoint inhibitors extends beyond additive effects. Preclinical data shows ADCs can increase T-cell infiltration into the tumor, potentially turning immunologically 'cold' tumors 'hot.' This offers a promising synergistic strategy, especially for PD-L1 negative patients who typically don't respond to immunotherapy alone.
Unlike T-cell engaging therapies, the bispecific antibody zanidatumab does not cause cytokine release syndrome (CRS). This unique safety feature is because it binds to two distinct sites on the HER2 receptor itself, rather than engaging T-cells, providing a key toxicity advantage.
The Matterhorn study found that adding the immunotherapy drug Durvalumab to FLOT chemotherapy significantly improved survival in localized gastric cancer. Surprisingly, this benefit extended to patients with low or negative PD-L1 expression, challenging the biomarker's predictive value for immunotherapy efficacy in this perioperative setting.
The Begonia trial showed an ~80% response rate by combining an ADC (Dato-DXD) with immunotherapy (Durvalumab) in first-line metastatic TNBC patients, 87% of whom were PD-L1 negative. This suggests ADCs, through immunogenic cell death, may create an immune-responsive environment, expanding IO benefit beyond the traditional biomarker.
In the increasingly common scenario of gastric cancer with multiple biomarkers (HER2, PD-L1, Claudin), experts recommend a clear hierarchy. Based on data maturity, HER2-targeted therapy is the first choice, followed by PD-L1 immunotherapy, with Claudin-targeted therapy third.
While immunotherapy is approved for gastroesophageal cancer with a PD-L1 CPS score of 1 or higher, clinical data reveals the most significant and durable survival benefit is largely confined to patients with high expression (CPS ≥10) or MSI-high status. The benefit for patients with CPS scores from 1 to 9 is considered borderline.
Experts recommend using the most effective first-line therapy, like zanidatumab combinations, for HER2-positive gastric cancer, despite the risk of the tumor losing HER2 expression upon progression. The substantial upfront survival benefit outweighs the concern of losing a second-line target like T-DXd.
The bispecific antibody zanidatumab causes HER2 receptors to cluster into "caps." This unique structure activates complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC), a potent immune response not achievable with older HER2 agents like trastuzumab, explaining its enhanced clinical activity.
Unlike trastuzumab, zanidatumab's effectiveness in the HORIZON-GEA-01 trial did not seem to depend on PD-L1 status. This surprising finding suggests a novel, possibly immune-mediated, mechanism of action that could expand its use to a broader patient population, including those who are PD-L1 negative.
The HORIZON-GEA1 trial demonstrated that zanidatumab, a bispecific antibody, provides a significant survival benefit in HER2-positive gastroesophageal cancers, even in patients with PD-L1 negative tumors. This finding challenges the conventional wisdom that checkpoint inhibitors are the primary driver of benefit in combination therapies.