Clinical trials with zanidatumab revealed significant diarrhea primarily in the first cycle. The successful management strategy involves mandatory loperamide twice daily for the first seven days to improve tolerability and prevent treatment discontinuation, a crucial implementation pearl.
The bispecific antibody zanidatumab causes HER2 receptors to cluster into "caps." This unique structure activates complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC), a potent immune response not achievable with older HER2 agents like trastuzumab, explaining its enhanced clinical activity.
Clinicians advise against continuing targeted agents like zolbituximab or trastuzumab after disease progression in gastroesophageal cancer. The biological heterogeneity of this cancer type means that if a targeted therapy isn't working, it's unlikely to provide benefit with a different chemotherapy backbone.
There's a growing recognition that the molecular profile of a primary tumor can differ significantly from its metastases. To guide treatment more accurately, the preferred practice is to biopsy an accessible metastatic lesion when possible, as this better reflects the biology of the active disease being treated.
In the SPOTLIGHT trial, adding zolbituximab to FOLFOX for Claudin-18.2 positive patients improved progression-free and overall survival. However, it did not significantly increase the objective response rate, demonstrating that survival benefit can be decoupled from tumor shrinkage metrics.
Clinicians are finding that forgoing the standard 800mg loading dose of zolbituximab and starting directly with the 600mg maintenance dose appears to mitigate acute gastrointestinal toxicity, particularly gastritis. This practical adjustment is being formally studied but is already used in practice to improve patient experience.
For frail elderly patients with HER2+ gastric cancer, starting with targeted therapy and immunotherapy alone can gauge response and tolerance. Cytotoxic chemotherapy can be added later if the patient's performance status improves, distinguishing disease-related frailty from baseline comorbidities.
In the increasingly common scenario of a patient with multiple positive biomarkers, a clear hierarchy exists for treatment decisions. Based on the robustness and maturity of clinical trial data, HER2-directed therapy is the top priority, followed by PD-L1 immunotherapy, with Claudin-18.2 targeting considered third.
In a phase 2 trial, the combination of zanidatumab and FOLFOX achieved a remarkable 95% response rate after two key modifications were made: adding prophylactic loperamide and dropping the 5-FU bolus. This suggests the bolus adds toxicity without clear benefit in this specific, potent combination.
As survival times for metastatic gastric cancer patients extend, managing long-term toxicity is paramount. Clinicians typically administer only 6-8 cycles of oxaliplatin to prevent severe, cumulative peripheral neuropathy, allowing for longer, better-tolerated maintenance therapy with biologics.
Patients with technically stage IV but low-volume, oligometastatic gastric cancer may benefit from an aggressive approach. This involves powerful systemic therapy followed by reassessment and potential local consolidation, such as radiation to any remaining viable disease sites, challenging traditional palliative approaches.
For patients over 75 with metastatic gastric cancer, a common practice is to reduce the oxaliplatin dose from 85 to 65 mg/m² and universally omit the 5-FU bolus from the FOLFOX regimen. This pragmatic approach aims to maintain efficacy while minimizing toxicity in a more vulnerable population.
Comparing control arms from the TOGA (11 months OS), KEYNOTE-811 (16 months), and HORIZON (19 months) trials reveals a steady improvement in patient outcomes. This trend, likely due to better second-line therapies and supportive care, makes it harder for new agents to show a relative benefit.