Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

The HORIZON-GEA1 trial demonstrated that zanidatumab, a bispecific antibody, provides a significant survival benefit in HER2-positive gastroesophageal cancers, even in patients with PD-L1 negative tumors. This finding challenges the conventional wisdom that checkpoint inhibitors are the primary driver of benefit in combination therapies.

Related Insights

Some experts advocate for using immunotherapy in PD-L1 negative (CPS 0) gastric adenocarcinoma, arguing the biomarker test itself is unreliable. Factors like stromal sampling variability mean a "zero" score might not be truly negative, justifying treatment in a patient who would otherwise be excluded.

Unlike T-cell engaging therapies, the bispecific antibody zanidatumab does not cause cytokine release syndrome (CRS). This unique safety feature is because it binds to two distinct sites on the HER2 receptor itself, rather than engaging T-cells, providing a key toxicity advantage.

The Matterhorn study found that adding the immunotherapy drug Durvalumab to FLOT chemotherapy significantly improved survival in localized gastric cancer. Surprisingly, this benefit extended to patients with low or negative PD-L1 expression, challenging the biomarker's predictive value for immunotherapy efficacy in this perioperative setting.

In the increasingly common scenario of gastric cancer with multiple biomarkers (HER2, PD-L1, Claudin), experts recommend a clear hierarchy. Based on data maturity, HER2-targeted therapy is the first choice, followed by PD-L1 immunotherapy, with Claudin-targeted therapy third.

Bispecific antibodies, which target two antigens like PD-1 and VEGF simultaneously, are viewed as the next major upgrade to standard immunotherapy. Their 'cooperative binding' mechanism is expected to improve efficacy and safety, and early trial data suggest they could replace decade-old checkpoint inhibitors like pembrolizumab as the new standard of care.

For HER2-positive gastric cancer, treatment choice depends on patient fitness. For young, fit patients, the more potent but toxic HORIZON-GA regimen (zanidatamab-based) is preferred. For elderly or less fit patients, the better-tolerated KEYNOTE-811 regimen (pembrolizumab/trastuzumab) remains the standard of care.

Experts recommend using the most effective first-line therapy, like zanidatumab combinations, for HER2-positive gastric cancer, despite the risk of the tumor losing HER2 expression upon progression. The substantial upfront survival benefit outweighs the concern of losing a second-line target like T-DXd.

The bispecific antibody zanidatumab causes HER2 receptors to cluster into "caps." This unique structure activates complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC), a potent immune response not achievable with older HER2 agents like trastuzumab, explaining its enhanced clinical activity.

In the increasingly common scenario of a patient with multiple positive biomarkers, a clear hierarchy exists for treatment decisions. Based on the robustness and maturity of clinical trial data, HER2-directed therapy is the top priority, followed by PD-L1 immunotherapy, with Claudin-18.2 targeting considered third.

Unlike trastuzumab, zanidatumab's effectiveness in the HORIZON-GEA-01 trial did not seem to depend on PD-L1 status. This surprising finding suggests a novel, possibly immune-mediated, mechanism of action that could expand its use to a broader patient population, including those who are PD-L1 negative.