The CRO, not product marketing, is closest to the customer and knows what they will buy. The product roadmap should be a collaborative effort driven by the CRO, who can directly tie feature delivery to ICP expansion and revenue forecasts. This creates accountability and predictable growth.

The CGO structure, as described by Thorne's Mary Beech, combines brand stewardship with direct P&L responsibility. This prevents the classic conflict where performance marketing might sacrifice long-term brand equity for immediate sales, as the CGO is accountable for both.

Moving marketing in-house can shift the department from a cost center to a growth engine. When the team is responsible for the entire funnel, from ad spend to final sale, incentives align on commercially effective work, not just creative awards.

Some CEOs encourage tension between sales and marketing. A more effective model is for the CRO and CMO to build enough trust to handle all disagreements—like lead quality or follow-up—behind closed doors. This prevents a culture of finger-pointing and presents a united front to leadership.

Having a CRO oversee both sales and marketing provides the CEO with a single person accountable for revenue. This structure prevents the common scenario where marketing hits its pipeline goal but sales misses its revenue target. It consolidates ownership of pipeline generation and closing under one leader.

To avoid biased prioritization, structure Marketing Ops as an independent unit rather than placing it under Demand Gen or a sales-led RevOps team. This allows Mops to be a neutral hub, prioritizing projects based on their impact on total company revenue, not just one department's goals.

If the board questions a marketing decision you made collaboratively with sales, the most effective response is for the CRO to intervene and publicly defend it. This demonstrates true alignment and shifts the focus from marketing cost to shared business impact.

Unifying marketing (CMO) and revenue (CRO) leadership under one person forces a holistic view of the customer journey. This structure removes the common friction of sales blaming marketing for lead quality, as one executive is accountable for the lead from creation to close.

At Informatica, the CEO made the CMO solely responsible for the company's entire sales pipeline. This shifts marketing's focus from departmental metrics (like MQLs) to the ultimate business outcome, forcing deep alignment with the CRO and sales organization.