The CRO, not product marketing, is closest to the customer and knows what they will buy. The product roadmap should be a collaborative effort driven by the CRO, who can directly tie feature delivery to ICP expansion and revenue forecasts. This creates accountability and predictable growth.

Don't dilute a CRO's value—leadership, hiring, and customer-facing skills—by bogging them down with data analysis. Supplement their strengths with a dedicated RevOps person who manages the data, allowing the CRO to focus on high-leverage activities.

Instead of a traditional structure, Gymshark has a CCO and CBO with complementary marketing skills. This unique org design ensures the customer's voice is dominant in strategic decisions, preventing short-term commercial goals from overriding long-term brand equity and customer focus.

To solve the persistent issue of sales and marketing misalignment, structure executive compensation around shared company revenue goals. When leaders' bonuses depend on overall revenue attainment rather than departmental metrics like pipeline or MQLs, it forces genuine collaboration and a unified focus on winning.

Some CEOs encourage tension between sales and marketing. A more effective model is for the CRO and CMO to build enough trust to handle all disagreements—like lead quality or follow-up—behind closed doors. This prevents a culture of finger-pointing and presents a united front to leadership.

A common failure mode for new CROs is attempting to create the sales playbook in isolation. Core pillars like ICP and value proposition are company-level decisions. The CRO's role is to be interdependent, facilitating this cross-functional creation process, not dictating it.

To avoid biased prioritization, structure Marketing Ops as an independent unit rather than placing it under Demand Gen or a sales-led RevOps team. This allows Mops to be a neutral hub, prioritizing projects based on their impact on total company revenue, not just one department's goals.

At Informatica, the CEO made the CMO solely responsible for the company's entire sales pipeline. This shifts marketing's focus from departmental metrics (like MQLs) to the ultimate business outcome, forcing deep alignment with the CRO and sales organization.

A controversial but effective organizational structure for B2B firms is to have the Chief Marketing Officer report to the Chief Sales Officer. Since B2B purchasing decisions are primarily sales-led and relationship-based, this hierarchy ensures marketing's activities directly serve sales objectives and contribute meaningfully to closing deals, aligning the entire funnel towards revenue.