Incidents of alleged founder misconduct, like lying about metrics and mistreating staff, are not isolated events. They are symptoms of a market bubble where excess capital fuels arrogance and unprofessional behavior, serving as a key warning sign for the wider industry.
Related Insights
In today's founder-centric climate, many VCs avoid confrontation to protect their reputation (NPS) within the founder network. This fear of being blacklisted leads them to abdicate their fiduciary duty to shareholders, failing to intervene even when a company's performance is dire and hard decisions are needed.
A huge Series A before clear product-market fit creates immense pressure to scale prematurely. This can force 'unnatural acts' and unrealistic expectations, potentially leading the company to implode. It challenges the 'more money is always better' mindset at the early stages.
Rabois draws a parallel between today's deal-focused founders and the "biz dev" executives of the dot-com era, who were later blamed for the bust. He sees the re-emergence of this archetype as a worrisome indicator of market froth.
While founder-led accountability is crucial, it's often misinterpreted. Leaders adopt a caricature of decisiveness, like mimicking Steve Jobs' harshness, which leads to micromanagement and alienates talented individual contributors who are key to scaling.
People surrounding a so-called genius, like Picasso's friends or employees at cult-like startups, often tolerate terrible behavior. They rationalize the unpleasantness by telling themselves they are part of an extraordinary, history-making experience, which creates a toxic enabling environment.
A cautionary tale for founders who gain early liquidity. Lavish spending on items like Ferraris signals a shift in focus away from the company and customers, creating employee resentment and signaling risk to investors. It's a form of "toxic wealth" that distracts from the mission.
The intense, unreasonable passion that fuels hyper-growth is the same trait that can lead a founder to make reckless, company-threatening decisions. You can't have the creative genius without the potential for destructive behavior. The same person who clears the path can also blow everything up.
A rising tide lifts all boats. The true test of a founder partnership emerges during downturns. Diligence should focus on teasing out traits like adaptability, humility, and accountability, which predict how a founder will react when plans inevitably go awry.
In a hyper-growth market where demand is at an all-time high, it's easy to mistake a favorable environment for individual skill. This powerful 'current' can hide significant operational flaws, which only become apparent when the market inevitably shifts, as seen in the ZIRP era.
The founders of Pipe, once valued at $2B, took significant money off the table via secondary sales before stepping back from operational roles. When the company's performance subsequently cratered amid operational missteps, it created deep resentment among investors and employees who were left holding devalued equity.
