When a prospect objects that your price range is too high, immediately pivot by asking what number they have discussed internally. This tactic leverages transparency—since you've shared your number, it's reasonable for them to share theirs—and quickly uncovers their real budget expectations.

Instead of guarding information as negotiation advice often suggests, proactively revealing your position (e.g., intent to pay cash, trade-in details) can disarm the other party. This unexpected transparency encourages them to reciprocate, often revealing critical information, like their own compensation plan, which you can then leverage.

Before investing time to create a perfect offer, secure a conditional commitment by asking, 'If I can deliver on these specific things we've discussed, do we have a deal?' This tactic prevents the prospect from backing out to 'think about it' and ensures your efforts are aligned with a committed buyer.

Ken Langone's negotiation principle is to let the other party feel they won more than they deserved. This isn't about getting less but about prioritizing long-term trust over maximizing a single transaction. This approach builds a reputation that attracts future opportunities and creates loyal partners.

Instead of lowballing, Bending Spoons makes a very fair, near-final offer immediately. This tactic builds a reputation for seriousness, similar to Warren Buffett's approach. It avoids lengthy back-and-forth and signals that they are not a buyer that can be "pushed around," creating an efficient and powerful deal-making process.

In creative or unproven domains, the absence of a performance history can be a positive. It allows negotiators to sell a purely optimistic vision without being anchored by past data. For first-time authors, this often leads to more open-ended and lucrative deals than for established ones.

In the *Freakonomics* deal, agent Suzanne Gluck repeatedly raised the price and tightened terms *after* the publisher agreed. This "yesterday's price is not today's price" tactic leverages the buyer's escalating commitment and fear of loss, forcing them to chase the deal.

Shift adversarial negotiations to collaborative problem-solving by transparently explaining your pricing model is based on four levers: volume, timing of cash, length of commitment, and timing of the deal. When a customer asks for a concession, you can explore which of the other levers they can adjust, making it a mutual exchange of value rather than a zero-sum haggle.

Instead of hiding information, Todd Capone's "transparent negotiation" advises telling buyers the four levers they can pull for a better price: contract term, volume, timing of cash, and predictability (signing by a certain date). This builds trust and turns negotiation into a collaborative process.