Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

In the *Freakonomics* deal, agent Suzanne Gluck repeatedly raised the price and tightened terms *after* the publisher agreed. This "yesterday's price is not today's price" tactic leverages the buyer's escalating commitment and fear of loss, forcing them to chase the deal.

Related Insights

When a prospect says your price is too high, reframe the conversation away from cost. Ask them, 'Independent of price, are we the vendor of choice?' This forces them to recommit to you as the best solution or admit they're still evaluating, strengthening your negotiation leverage.

Frame every negotiation around four core business drivers. Offer discounts not as concessions, but as payments for the customer giving you something valuable: more volume, faster cash payments, a longer contract commitment, or a predictable closing date. This shifts the conversation from haggling to a structured, collaborative process.

When a buyer insists on a "termination for convenience" clause, explain that it nullifies the "length of commitment" lever. This effectively changes a multi-year agreement into a month-to-month one, which logically carries a much higher price (e.g., a 30-35% increase). This frames the clause not as a legal term, but a commercial one with a clear cost.

If a customer asks to push a signed deal past an agreed-upon deadline, don't say yes or no. Saying "I don't know if we can hold the price" creates productive uncertainty. This forces them to weigh the risk of losing their discount against the inconvenience of finding a way to sign on time, often leading them to solve the problem themselves.

Contrary to classic advice, literary agent Suzanne Gluck avoids making the first offer. She builds a compelling case, letting the other party's enthusiasm potentially lead them to a number higher than she would have proposed. If their offer is too low, she simply dismisses it and resets the baseline.

To increase average deal size, introduce a new, much higher-priced package (e.g., $100k) and pitch it as your primary offer. Commit to selling it hard. For clients who object, you can then downsell to your original core offer (now priced at $35k), which appears incredibly reasonable by comparison. This captures whales and boosts conversions on your main offer.

Before investing time to create a perfect offer, secure a conditional commitment by asking, 'If I can deliver on these specific things we've discussed, do we have a deal?' This tactic prevents the prospect from backing out to 'think about it' and ensures your efforts are aligned with a committed buyer.

Discussing pricing early doesn't mean you're in the proposal stage. True proposal and negotiation begins only after you have secured explicit agreement on the problem, the solution, and from the key decision-maker. At this point, the deal would close if it were free; price is the only remaining variable.

When a buyer requests to reduce deal scope late in a negotiation (e.g., halving the user count), don't just cut the price in half. Explain that your pricing is based on volume. Frame the change as a fundamental shift in the deal's economics, which will increase the per-unit cost, making the smaller deal less attractive and protecting your original proposal.

When negotiating a price increase, if the customer accepts immediately without pushback, it’s a strong signal you've significantly underpriced your product. Buildots' founder prepared for a negotiation over a 4x price increase, but the client agreed instantly, revealing the product's true value.