Shift adversarial negotiations to collaborative problem-solving by transparently explaining your pricing model is based on four levers: volume, timing of cash, length of commitment, and timing of the deal. When a customer asks for a concession, you can explore which of the other levers they can adjust, making it a mutual exchange of value rather than a zero-sum haggle.
Related Insights
When you easily concede on seemingly small items like payment terms, you inadvertently tell the customer that your pricing isn't firm. This encourages them to push for more discounts, slowing down the deal. Instead, trade every concession for something of value to your business.
Frame every negotiation around four core business drivers. Offer discounts not as concessions, but as payments for the customer giving you something valuable: more volume, faster cash payments, a longer contract commitment, or a predictable closing date. This shifts the conversation from haggling to a structured, collaborative process.
Instead of stating a single number, introduce price as a range based on what similar customers invest to solve comparable problems. This normalizes the cost, provides a clear budget anchor, and frames the conversation around investment and partnership rather than a transactional price tag.
Proposing an outcome-based pricing model next to a high fixed-fee option forces the negotiation to focus on value, not cost. Even if the customer chooses the fixed fee, they're anchored on a much higher number and are less likely to negotiate it down significantly.
By proactively asking about potential deal-killers like budget or partner approval early in the sales process, you transform them from adversarial objections into collaborative obstacles. This disarms the buyer's defensiveness and makes them easier to solve together, preventing them from being used as excuses later.
When a buyer requests to reduce deal scope late in a negotiation (e.g., halving the user count), don't just cut the price in half. Explain that your pricing is based on volume. Frame the change as a fundamental shift in the deal's economics, which will increase the per-unit cost, making the smaller deal less attractive and protecting your original proposal.
The strategy of setting an artificially high price to negotiate down is dangerous in an era of high transparency. When customers inevitably discover they paid more than peers, it destroys trust and reputation. Maintain a consistent price, offering flexibility only through standardized commercial levers.
Instead of hiding information, Todd Capone's "transparent negotiation" advises telling buyers the four levers they can pull for a better price: contract term, volume, timing of cash, and predictability (signing by a certain date). This builds trust and turns negotiation into a collaborative process.
Never present a price in a vacuum. Just before revealing the investment amount, explicitly summarize the customer's key challenges and pains. Gaining their agreement on the severity of the problem anchors the price to the value of the solution, making the cost seem more reasonable in comparison.
Instead of hiding price until the end of the sales cycle, be transparent from the start. Acknowledge if your solution is at the high end of the market and provide a realistic price range based on their environment. This allows you to quickly qualify out buyers with misaligned budgets, saving your most valuable asset: time.