To counter government attempts to control academic policy by threatening federal funding, universities must coordinate their response. Divided, they can be picked off one by one. A unified strategy involving litigation and alumni fundraising is crucial to protect academic independence.
Related Insights
When the government guaranteed student loans, it removed the risk for colleges. This allowed them to hike tuition prices unchecked, knowing students had access to funding. The resulting flood of graduates has also made a college degree less of a differentiator in the job market.
Accepting a government salary fundamentally changes an advisor's role into that of an employee, creating an obligation of loyalty that compromises intellectual honesty. To provide unvarnished, objective advice to leaders, an advisor must remain financially independent from the government.
The NYT CEO frames lawsuits and public denigration from political figures not as genuine legal or reputational threats, but as a calculated tactic to intimidate and deter high-quality, independent reporting. The company's explicit stance is to refuse to be cowed by this strategy.
Elite universities with massive endowments and shrinking acceptance rates are betraying their public service mission. By failing to expand enrollment, they function more like exclusive 'hedge funds offering classes' that manufacture scarcity to protect their brand prestige, rather than educational institutions aiming to maximize societal impact.
To drive change in a tenure-protected environment, ASU's president empowered faculty to redesign their own departments. This led them to eliminate 85 legacy units and create 40 new, purpose-driven schools, such as turning a Geology department into a 'School for Earth and Space Exploration'.
To fix the student debt crisis, universities should be financially on the hook for the first portion of any loan default (e.g., $20,000). This "first loss" position would compel them to underwrite the economic viability of their own degrees, creating a powerful market check against pushing students into overpriced and low-value programs.
Top universities with billion-dollar endowments should lose their tax-free status if they fail to grow enrollment. By artificially limiting admissions, they behave like exclusive luxury brands (e.g., "Birkin bags") that cater to the wealthy, rather than fulfilling their mission as engines of social mobility and public service.
The binding nature of 'early decision' programs prevents accepted students from leveraging competing financial aid offers. This tactic, combined with universities raising prices in lockstep, effectively creates a cartel that maintains total pricing power over families.
ASU President Michael Crow argues that Ivy League schools are based on the colonial British model—small, elite, and fundamentally unscalable. This structure is insufficient for a large, modern democracy, which demands new university designs built for scale, speed, and broad accessibility.
A radical policy proposal, like seizing university endowments for reparations, can be a strategic move to create internal conflict within a political coalition by forcing two key demographics (e.g., progressive students and African Americans) into a zero-sum conflict over resources and status.
