Research highlights a significant bias in promotion decisions. Men are often judged on their perceived capabilities two years in the future, allowing for deficits. In contrast, women are typically evaluated strictly against their current skill set, penalizing them for not already possessing every requirement of the role.
Related Insights
Pinterest's CEO reframes the DEI debate by stating it is not in conflict with meritocracy, but a requirement for it. A system that isn't inclusive inherently limits its talent pool, making it less meritorious. By focusing on inclusion, Pinterest gained an "unfair share of great talent" and outperformed competitors.
Challenge the 'hire slow' mantra. Hiring is an intuitive guess, so act quickly. Once a person is in the organization, their performance is a known fact, not a guess. This clarity allows for faster decisions—both in removing underperformers and, crucially, in accelerating the promotion of superstars ahead of standard review cycles.
Leaders in investment organizations are often promoted for their exceptional technical skills—analysis, presentations—not for their management abilities. This creates a leadership deficit that requires deliberate focus and coaching to overcome.
The most promising hires are often high-agency individuals constrained by their current environment—'caged animals' who need to be unleashed. Look for candidates who could achieve significantly more if not for their team or organization's limitations. This is a powerful signal of untapped potential and resourcefulness.
Tying SDR promotions to time-in-seat fosters stagnation. Instead, create a clear, multi-level roadmap where advancement is based solely on hitting performance thresholds. This model rewards high-achievers, provides constant motivation, and gives reps control over their career trajectory.
Career challenges faced by professional women are not random but fall into seven recurring patterns or "power gaps." These include not recognizing accomplishments, isolating from support, and acquiescing to mistreatment. Identifying which gaps are present allows for targeted, effective action.
Well-meaning professionals often take on "glue work" like improving onboarding or team culture. While valuable, this work often doesn't align with promotion criteria for senior roles. Audit your energy and focus on activities directly tied to the expectations of the role you want.
Research shows women often have more mentors than men, but men have significantly more sponsors. Mentors offer advice, while sponsors use their influence to advocate and create opportunities. This distinction is critical for advancement, as sponsorship provides access to roles that mentorship alone cannot.
The "attitude vs. aptitude" debate is flawed. Instead, hire the person with the smallest skill deficiency relative to the role's requirements. For a cashier, attitude is the harder skill to train. For an AI researcher, technical aptitude is. The key question is always: is it worth our resources to train this specific gap?
Voters subconsciously conflate physical traits like height and deep voices with leadership qualities. This heuristic, termed 'awesome dad energy,' provides a significant, often unacknowledged advantage to male candidates who fit the archetype, revealing a deep-seated sexism in how leadership potential is perceived.
