We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.
A decade ago, regional solidarity pressured the U.S. to normalize relations. Today, Latin America is fragmented, and many leaders see Cuba's crisis as its own fault, removing a key diplomatic lever that existed during the Obama era.
The Cuban government failed to implement necessary economic reforms during the 'Obama window' of opportunity, leaving the economy fragile and far more susceptible to the subsequent 'maximum pressure' campaign from the U.S.
An expert assesses a 70-80% probability that Cuba will cut a deal with the Trump administration, similar to Venezuela's. Lacking a foreign patron like the USSR or Chavez-era Venezuela, the Cuban regime is motivated by economic desperation to make a pragmatic deal, trading alignment for relief from US sanctions to maintain power.
Despite a strong sense of nationalism, suffering in Cuba has become so profound that many citizens now see American intervention as the only path to change. Their desperation for a resolution outweighs their historical opposition to foreign involvement, viewing it as a "get it over and done with" scenario.
A coalition of right-leaning Latin American leaders has aligned with Donald Trump, creating a regional political bloc. However, this "orange shift" is fundamentally tied to Trump's presidency and is expected to dissolve when he leaves office in January 2029, making it a temporary, personality-driven phenomenon rather than a durable ideological realignment.
With Cuba facing a severe economic collapse, Senator Marco Rubio is reportedly leading secret talks for a U.S. aid deal. This is a strategic move to secure a significant foreign policy win that would appeal to Florida's influential Cuban-American voters and establish his credentials for a future presidential campaign.
The goal was to give Cubans a taste of economic freedom and normality, creating internal pressure for change that would overwhelm the government's capacity to control the pace of reform. It was a strategy of 'corrosive normality'.
The US strategy in Cuba may not be to oust the Castro family entirely, but to replace the current president while leaving the core power structure and even Castro relatives intact. This mirrors the approach in Venezuela, suggesting a pragmatic rather than purely ideological goal.
By refusing to bend to pressure, the Cuban government forces the US into a difficult position: either back down or escalate to a full-scale invasion, a politically unpalatable option the US wants to avoid.
The complex, codified U.S. sanctions regime prevents the use of traditional economic and development tools that would be essential to support a successful reform process in Cuba, creating a self-defeating policy paradox.
Cuba's unified, long-standing leadership contrasts sharply with Venezuela's competing factions and questioned presidential legitimacy, making a simple 'decapitation' strike strategy ineffective and irrelevant for Havana.