We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.
During interviews, the first mock cold call is expected to be poor. The real test is giving the candidate one or two pieces of feedback and observing their second attempt. Their ability to listen, adapt, and apply coaching is a far better indicator of potential than their initial performance.
To efficiently screen sales reps, hold a group interview where candidates perform a pre-sent script. Then, provide live feedback and ask them to try again. This quickly assesses their preparation, ego, and coachability.
When interviewing salespeople, the biggest red flag is blame. Strong candidates demonstrate humility and self-reflection by taking ownership of lost deals and analyzing their own shortcomings. Weaker candidates deflect, blaming the product, competition, or other external factors, signaling a lack of coachability.
To hire for traits over background, Mark Kosaglo suggests testing for coachability directly. Run a skill-based roleplay (e.g., discovery), provide specific feedback, and then run the exact same roleplay again. The key is to see if the candidate can actually implement the coaching, not just if they are open to receiving it.
Senior commercial leaders are professional interviewers who excel at telling you what you want to hear. A hiring process based solely on conversation is flawed. To truly vet a candidate, you must incorporate exercises that force them to demonstrate their abilities and "show you the receipts" of their claims.
When a cold call fails, don't just move on. Ask the prospect directly for feedback: was it a lack of brand recognition, or was the pitch itself not compelling? This turns a rejection into an immediate coaching opportunity to refine your messaging.
To assess a sales candidate's self-awareness and adaptability, ask them to describe their process for a C-level meeting. After they detail their strategy, challenge them with: "So why haven't you done that in this meeting?" Their real-time reaction is a powerful indicator of their ability to course-correct under pressure.
To accurately assess an unteachable trait like coachability, you can't just ask about it. You must create a situation that requires it. For coachability, run a brief role-play, provide direct feedback, and ask them to do it again, observing their verbal and non-verbal reactions to the coaching itself.
In an SDR interview, the first mock cold call will likely be poor. The real test is the second attempt. Give the candidate one or two pieces of feedback and observe if they can implement the change. Their ability to be coached is a far better predictor of success.
Instead of scrapping your entire sales script after a bad call, make one small tweak. Test that change over a significant number of conversations (e.g., 10) to validate its effectiveness with data before making further adjustments. This prevents overreacting to single failures.
When doing outbound recruiting for sales talent, flip the script on the first call. Instead of grilling the candidate, treat it as a sales call where you're selling them on the company. The goal is to determine if it's a "great or terrible use of time" to continue, with the promise that the grilling comes later.