Unlike traditional software that optimizes for time-in-app, the most successful AI products will be measured by their ability to save users time. The new benchmark for value will be how much cognitive load or manual work is automated "behind the scenes," fundamentally changing the definition of a successful product.

When evaluating AI agents, the total cost of task completion is what matters. A model with a higher per-token cost can be more economical if it resolves a user's query in fewer turns than a cheaper, less capable model. This makes "number of turns" a primary efficiency metric.

While time savings from AI are a basic benefit ("table stakes"), the true business impact of an agentic GTM platform is measured by core revenue metrics. Leaders should track pipeline velocity, conversion rates, average contract value (ACV), and win rates to prove ROI, not just efficiency gains.

The primary ROI of sales AI isn't just saved time, but the reallocation of that time. Evaluate and justify AI tools based on their ability to maximize Customer Facing Time (CFT), as this directly increases both the quantity and quality of customer interactions, leading to better performance.

Traditional product metrics like DAU are meaningless for autonomous AI agents that operate without user interaction. Product teams must redefine success by focusing on tangible business outcomes. Instead of tracking agent usage, measure "support tickets automatically closed" or "workflows completed."

The most significant gains from AI will not come from automating existing human tasks. Instead, value is unlocked by allowing AI agents to develop entirely new, non-human processes to achieve goals. This requires a shift from process mapping to goal-oriented process invention.

Unlike other business areas, contact centers have highly sophisticated, pre-existing metrics (like average handle time). This allows businesses to apply the same measurement tools to AI agents, enabling a direct and precise comparison of performance, cost, and overall effectiveness against human counterparts.

Open and click rates are ineffective for measuring AI-driven, two-way conversations. Instead, leaders should adopt new KPIs: outcome metrics (e.g., meetings booked), conversational quality (tracking an agent's 'I don't know' rate to measure trust), and, ultimately, customer lifetime value.

When AI can directly analyze unstructured feedback and operational data to infer customer sentiment and identify drivers of dissatisfaction, the need to explicitly ask customers through surveys diminishes. The focus can shift from merely measuring metrics like NPS to directly fixing the underlying problems the AI identifies.