In a multi-year bullish environment for emerging markets, technical indicators that worked well post-2010 may consistently flash 'overbought' signals without leading to significant corrections. Strategists should attach a higher probability to these indicators failing, favoring the long-term structural view over short-term tactical signals.
Related Insights
The EM FX risk appetite index, which has a strong track record of predicting downturns, is at an extreme level, suggesting a correction. However, the model was trained during a dollar-bullish cycle and may be misinterpreting the current pro-cyclical, bearish-dollar environment, potentially making its contrarian signal less reliable this time.
The positive outlook for EM assets is now a consensus view, dangerously reliant on two core assumptions: a strong global cyclical backdrop and the outperformance of metals over energy. This widespread agreement creates a "lack of imagination" for potential downsides, making the market vulnerable if these pillars falter.
A paradox exists in emerging market FX positioning. Medium-term structural indicators show that the asset class is not over-owned, suggesting room for growth. However, short-term technical indicators are approaching an "extreme positive threshold," signaling a high risk of a near-term pullback, particularly in currencies highly sensitive to the global cyclical backdrop. This warrants a more selective investment approach.
Analysis of a proprietary EM FX risk index shows that when an "overbought" signal appears to fail, it's not wrong about the market's condition. Instead, extreme readings predict a delayed correction, typically by about three weeks, as strong positive momentum takes longer to reverse.
After being 'shunned by the world for 10 to 15 years,' emerging market assets are benefiting from a slow-moving, structural diversification away from heavily-owned U.S. assets. This long-term trend provides a background source of demand and support, contributing to the asset class's current resilience against short-term volatility.
A J.P. Morgan risk appetite index, which has reliably signaled EM currency reversals, is currently not working as expected. This failure may stem from its training data, which comes from a long-term bullish dollar era. A potential shift in this macro regime could be rendering the technical indicator obsolete.
Emerging vs. developed market outperformance typically runs in 7-10 year cycles. The current 14-year cycle of EM underperformance is historically long, suggesting markets are approaching a key inflection point driven by a weakening dollar, cheaper currencies, and accelerating earnings growth off a low base.
The primary indicator of a healthy bull market is when technical breakouts are sustained and lead to higher prices. If breakouts consistently fail and your positions stagnate, it's a red flag that the underlying trend is weakening, even if indices are high.
Despite record-high economic activity surprises, emerging market currencies (EMFX) are fairly valued, not overextended. This suggests near-term upside for spot prices is limited, making carry returns the more likely driver of performance in this bullish cyclical environment.
Despite a supportive macro environment, the most immediate threat to emerging market assets comes from increasingly crowded investor positioning. As tactical indicators rise, assets become vulnerable to sharp corrections from sentiment shifts, a dynamic recently demonstrated by the Brazilian Real's 5% drop.