Analysis of a proprietary EM FX risk index shows that when an "overbought" signal appears to fail, it's not wrong about the market's condition. Instead, extreme readings predict a delayed correction, typically by about three weeks, as strong positive momentum takes longer to reverse.
Related Insights
Assets that grind higher over decades rarely reverse course suddenly. Instead, the prolonged, slow uptrend builds investor complacency, leading to an overbought state and a final parabolic surge. This blow-off top is the necessary precondition for a significant, sustained decline, a pattern Gurevich notes he missed in the bond market.
The EM FX risk appetite index, which has a strong track record of predicting downturns, is at an extreme level, suggesting a correction. However, the model was trained during a dollar-bullish cycle and may be misinterpreting the current pro-cyclical, bearish-dollar environment, potentially making its contrarian signal less reliable this time.
A paradox exists in emerging market FX positioning. Medium-term structural indicators show that the asset class is not over-owned, suggesting room for growth. However, short-term technical indicators are approaching an "extreme positive threshold," signaling a high risk of a near-term pullback, particularly in currencies highly sensitive to the global cyclical backdrop. This warrants a more selective investment approach.
Calling a market top is a technical exercise, as fundamentals lag significantly. A reliable sell signal emerges when the market's leadership narrows to a few "generals." When a critical number of these leaders (e.g., three of the top seven) fall below their 200-day moving average, the rally is likely over.
A J.P. Morgan risk appetite index, which has reliably signaled EM currency reversals, is currently not working as expected. This failure may stem from its training data, which comes from a long-term bullish dollar era. A potential shift in this macro regime could be rendering the technical indicator obsolete.
The primary indicator of a healthy bull market is when technical breakouts are sustained and lead to higher prices. If breakouts consistently fail and your positions stagnate, it's a red flag that the underlying trend is weakening, even if indices are high.
Current market bullishness is at levels seen only a few times in the past decade. Two of those instances led to corrections within three months. This euphoria, combined with low volatility and high leverage, makes the market vulnerable to even minor negative news.
A proprietary model tracking investor positioning shows a historic degree of credit bullishness, second-highest on a median basis. Such extremes typically precede adverse outcomes in financial markets, increasing the probability of a violent correction or choppy trading over the next one to three months.
Contrary to intuition, widespread fear and discussion of a market bubble often precede a final, insane surge upward. The real crash tends to happen later, when the consensus shifts to believing in a 'new economic model.' This highlights a key psychological dynamic of market cycles where peak anxiety doesn't signal an immediate top.
Despite a supportive macro environment, the most immediate threat to emerging market assets comes from increasingly crowded investor positioning. As tactical indicators rise, assets become vulnerable to sharp corrections from sentiment shifts, a dynamic recently demonstrated by the Brazilian Real's 5% drop.