The positive outlook for EM assets is now a consensus view, dangerously reliant on two core assumptions: a strong global cyclical backdrop and the outperformance of metals over energy. This widespread agreement creates a "lack of imagination" for potential downsides, making the market vulnerable if these pillars falter.

Related Insights

A paradox exists in emerging market FX positioning. Medium-term structural indicators show that the asset class is not over-owned, suggesting room for growth. However, short-term technical indicators are approaching an "extreme positive threshold," signaling a high risk of a near-term pullback, particularly in currencies highly sensitive to the global cyclical backdrop. This warrants a more selective investment approach.

Despite strong year-to-date performance in what feels like a resilient market, seasoned EM sovereign credit investors are publicly emphasizing caution. They recognize that stretched valuations, described as a 'glass overflowing', and potential US recession risks create significant downside vulnerability.

While a stronger growth environment supports EM currencies, it is problematic for low-yielding EM government bonds. Their valuations were based on aggressive local central bank easing cycles which now have less scope to continue, especially with a potentially shallower Fed cutting cycle, making them vulnerable to a correction.

A significant disconnect exists between soaring precious and industrial metal prices and the currencies of the exporting EM countries. Despite nations like Chile, Peru, and South Africa seeing a major terms-of-trade boost, their FX markets have not priced in this fundamental improvement. This suggests a potential investment opportunity, as fundamentals are expected to eventually impact asset prices more directly.

Emerging vs. developed market outperformance typically runs in 7-10 year cycles. The current 14-year cycle of EM underperformance is historically long, suggesting markets are approaching a key inflection point driven by a weakening dollar, cheaper currencies, and accelerating earnings growth off a low base.

Despite alarming geopolitical headlines concerning Venezuela, Iran, and US-NATO relations, emerging markets are showing resilience. Investors are largely ignoring this "noise," focusing on the strong cyclical backdrop: upward growth revisions, loose financial conditions, and supportive commodity prices. Markets are prioritizing the global economic outlook over political shocks unless those shocks directly threaten growth.

Because emerging market cycles are so unpredictable and violent, any mid-sized manager focused on a single asset class or region is not questioning *if* they will go out of business, but *when*. Business model diversification is the only path to long-term survival.

The extra return investors receive for taking on risk has compressed globally. For emerging markets, this premium is now negative at -1%, meaning investors are not being paid for the additional risk they're assuming compared to safer assets like government bonds.

Crossmark's Chief Market Strategist identifies investor complacency as her primary concern. The market's collective belief that earnings will continue to support upward momentum, despite underlying risks, creates a dangerous environment where investors are unprepared for shocks.

Despite a supportive macro environment, the most immediate threat to emerging market assets comes from increasingly crowded investor positioning. As tactical indicators rise, assets become vulnerable to sharp corrections from sentiment shifts, a dynamic recently demonstrated by the Brazilian Real's 5% drop.