Unlike the US, emerging markets are constrained by financial markets. If they let their fiscal balance deteriorate, markets punish their currency, triggering a vicious cycle of inflation and higher interest rates. This threat serves as a natural check on government spending, enforcing a level of fiscal responsibility.
China's economic structure, which funnels state-backed capital into sectors like EVs, inherently creates overinvestment and excess capacity. This distorted cost of capital leads to hyper-competitive industries, making it difficult for even successful companies to generate predictable, growing returns for shareholders.
Active management is more viable in emerging markets than in the US. The largest EM ETF (EEM) has a high 0.72% expense ratio, the universe of stocks is twice as large as the US, and analyst coverage is sparse. This creates significant opportunities for skilled stock pickers to outperform passive strategies.
A powerful EM strategy involves identifying businesses with proven, powerful models from developed markets, like American Tower. Local EM investor bases may not be familiar with the model's potential, creating an opportunity to buy these companies at a displaced valuation before their predictable results drive multiple expansion.
Emerging vs. developed market outperformance typically runs in 7-10 year cycles. The current 14-year cycle of EM underperformance is historically long, suggesting markets are approaching a key inflection point driven by a weakening dollar, cheaper currencies, and accelerating earnings growth off a low base.
Brazil's next election presents a major catalyst. An opposition win would likely unlock pent-up investment and allow high real interest rates to fall, creating a virtuous cycle. Conversely, a win for the incumbent party would likely keep rates higher for longer, suppressing growth and investment.
While the U.S. AI strategy pursues a 'winner-take-all' model leading to high profits, China's state-backed approach aims to commoditize AI. By spreading resources across many players to create a low-cost, replicable model for export, it structurally limits the potential for monopoly profits to accrue to shareholders.
Contrary to the growth narrative, the MSCI China index returned just 3.4% over the last decade with over 24% volatility. During the same period, the emerging market ex-China index delivered a higher return of 4.8% with significantly lower volatility (17.5%), highlighting structural headwinds in China for investors.