DeepMind's core breakthrough was treating AI like a child, not a machine. Instead of programming complex strategies, they taught it to master tasks through simple games like Pong, giving it only one rule ('score go up is good') and allowing it to learn for itself through trial and error.

An AI's ability to code complex games and physics simulations is a strong indicator of its overall power. This showcases its deep understanding and ability to handle sophisticated, multi-layered logic required for complex business applications, not just simple tasks.

Static benchmarks are easily gamed. Dynamic environments like the game Diplomacy force models to negotiate, strategize, and even lie, offering a richer, more realistic evaluation of their capabilities beyond pure performance metrics like reasoning or coding.

When tested at scale in Civilization, different LLMs don't just produce random outputs; they develop consistent and divergent strategic 'personalities.' One model might consistently play aggressively, while another favors diplomacy, revealing that LLMs encode coherent, stable reasoning styles.

As benchmarks become standard, AI labs optimize models to excel at them, leading to score inflation without necessarily improving generalized intelligence. The solution isn't a single perfect test, but continuously creating new evals that measure capabilities relevant to real-world user needs.

Traditional AI benchmarks are seen as increasingly incremental and less interesting. The new frontier for evaluating a model's true capability lies in applied, complex tasks that mimic real-world interaction, such as building in Minecraft (MC Bench) or managing a simulated business (VendingBench), which are more revealing of raw intelligence.

As reinforcement learning (RL) techniques mature, the core challenge shifts from the algorithm to the problem definition. The competitive moat for AI companies will be their ability to create high-fidelity environments and benchmarks that accurately represent complex, real-world tasks, effectively teaching the AI what matters.

An analysis of AI model performance shows a 2-2.5x improvement in intelligence scores across all major players within the last year. This rapid advancement is leading to near-perfect scores on existing benchmarks, indicating a need for new, more challenging tests to measure future progress.

Large Language Models are uniquely suited for complex strategy games like Civilization. Their strength lies not in calculation, where traditional AI excels, but in maintaining long-term narrative consistency and strategic coherence, which is the actual bottleneck for game mastery.