For large projects, use a high-level AI (like Claude's Mac app) as a strategic partner to break down the work and write prompts for a code-execution AI (like Conductor). This 'CTO' AI can then evaluate the generated code, creating a powerful, multi-layered workflow for complex development.
Related Insights
For niche tasks, leverage an AI model with deep domain knowledge (like Claude for its own 'Skills' feature) to create highly specific prompts. Then, feed these optimized prompts into a powerful, generalist coding assistant (like Google's) to achieve a more accurate and robust final product.
For experienced users of Claude Code, the most critical step is collaborating with the AI on its plan. Once the plan is solid, the subsequent code generation by a model like Opus 4.5 is so reliable that it can be auto-accepted. The developer's job becomes plan architect, not code monkey.
An effective AI development workflow involves treating models as a team of specialists. Use Claude as the reliable 'workhorse' for building an application from the ground up, while leveraging models like Gemini or GPT-4 as 'advisory models' for creative input and alternative problem-solving perspectives.
The creator of Claude Code's workflow is no longer about deep work on a single task. Instead, he kicks off multiple AI agents ("clods") in parallel and "tends" to them by reviewing plans and answering questions. This "multi-clotting" approach makes him more of a manager than a doer.
Instead of prompting a specialized AI tool directly, experts employ a meta-workflow. They first use a general LLM like ChatGPT or Claude to generate a detailed, context-rich 'master prompt' based on a PRD or user story, which they then paste into the specialized tool for superior results.
Use the Claude chat application for deep research on technical architecture and best practices *before* coding. It can research topics for over 10 minutes, providing a well-summarized plan that you can then feed into a dedicated coding tool like Cursor or Claude Code for implementation.
To optimize AI agent costs and avoid usage limits, adopt a “brain vs. muscles” strategy. Use a high-capability model like Claude Opus for strategic thinking and planning. Then, instruct it to delegate execution-heavy tasks, like writing code, to more specialized and cost-effective models like Codex.
Instead of relying on a single, all-purpose coding agent, the most effective workflow involves using different agents for their specific strengths. For example, using the 'Friday' agent for UI tasks, 'Charlie' for code reviews, and 'Claude Code' for research and backend logic.
Top performers won't rely on a single AI platform. Instead, they will act as a conductor, directing various specialized AI agents (like Claude, Gemini, ChatGPT) to perform specific tasks. This requires understanding the strengths of different tools and combining their outputs for maximum productivity.
To get AI agents to perform complex tasks in existing code, a three-stage workflow is key. First, have the agent research and objectively document how the codebase works. Second, use that research to create a step-by-step implementation plan. Finally, execute the plan. This structured approach prevents the agent from wasting context on discovery during implementation.
