The workflow with an AI coding assistant is described as feeling like the human is the robot, not the programmer. The primary role shifts from writing code to shuttling information between different contexts and the AI model, which performs the heavy lifting of code generation and problem-solving.

Unlike competitors focused on creating autonomous agents, Claude Code is designed as a 'pair programmer.' It emphasizes a collaborative workflow where the human and AI work together through planning and iteration, rather than the human simply delegating a task and awaiting the result.

Using AI to code doesn't mean sacrificing craftsmanship. It shifts the craftsman's role from writing every line to being a director with a strong vision. The key is measuring the AI's output against that vision and ensuring each piece fits the larger puzzle correctly, not just functionally.

LLMs often get stuck or pursue incorrect paths on complex tasks. "Plan mode" forces Claude Code to present its step-by-step checklist for your approval before it starts editing files. This allows you to correct its logic and assumptions upfront, ensuring the final output aligns with your intent and saving time.

As AI agents handle the mechanics of code generation, the primary role of a developer is elevated. The new bottlenecks are not typing speed or syntax, but higher-level cognitive tasks: deciding what to build, designing system architecture, and curating the AI's work.

AI tools are automating code generation, reducing the time developers spend writing it. Consequently, the primary skill shifts to carefully reviewing and verifying the AI-generated code for correctness and security. This means a developer's time is now spent more on review and architecture than on implementation.

As AI makes the act of writing code a commodity, the primary challenge is no longer execution but discovery. The most valuable work becomes prototyping and exploring to determine *what* should be built, increasing the strategic importance of the design function.

Experienced engineers using tools like Claude Code are no longer writing significant amounts of code. Their primary role shifts to designing systems, defining tasks, and managing a team of AI agents that perform the actual implementation, fundamentally changing the software development workflow.

As AI writes most of the code, the highest-leverage human activity will shift from reviewing pull requests to reviewing the AI's research and implementation plans. Collaborating on the plan provides a narrative journey of the upcoming changes, allowing for high-level course correction before hundreds of lines of bad code are ever generated.