An effective AI development workflow involves treating models as a team of specialists. Use Claude as the reliable 'workhorse' for building an application from the ground up, while leveraging models like Gemini or GPT-4 as 'advisory models' for creative input and alternative problem-solving perspectives.
Related Insights
A common pattern for developers building with generative media is to use two types of models. A cheaper, lower-quality 'workhorse' model is used for high-volume tasks like prototyping. A second, expensive, state-of-the-art 'hero' model is then reserved for the final, high-quality output, optimizing for cost and quality.
With models like Gemini 3, the key skill is shifting from crafting hyper-specific, constrained prompts to making ambitious, multi-faceted requests. Users trained on older models tend to pare down their asks, but the latest AIs are 'pent up with creative capability' and yield better results from bigger challenges.
A repeatable workflow exists for non-technical builders: research ideas with Perplexity, formalize a Product Requirements Document with Claude, generate a frontend prototype with Magic Patterns, and then deploy the code in Replit with a Supabase backend.
High productivity isn't about using AI for everything. It's a disciplined workflow: breaking a task into sub-problems, using an LLM for high-leverage parts like scaffolding and tests, and reserving human focus for the core implementation. This avoids the sunk cost of forcing AI on unsuitable tasks.
Use the Claude chat application for deep research on technical architecture and best practices *before* coding. It can research topics for over 10 minutes, providing a well-summarized plan that you can then feed into a dedicated coding tool like Cursor or Claude Code for implementation.
Use Claude's "Artifacts" feature to generate interactive, LLM-powered application prototypes directly from a prompt. This allows product managers to test the feel and flow of a conversational AI, including latency and response length, without needing API keys or engineering support, bridging the gap between a static mock and a coded MVP.
Building a single, all-purpose AI is like hiring one person for every company role. To maximize accuracy and creativity, build multiple custom GPTs, each trained for a specific function like copywriting or operations, and have them collaborate.
Instead of relying on a single, all-purpose coding agent, the most effective workflow involves using different agents for their specific strengths. For example, using the 'Friday' agent for UI tasks, 'Charlie' for code reviews, and 'Claude Code' for research and backend logic.
Top performers won't rely on a single AI platform. Instead, they will act as a conductor, directing various specialized AI agents (like Claude, Gemini, ChatGPT) to perform specific tasks. This requires understanding the strengths of different tools and combining their outputs for maximum productivity.
Treat generative AI not as a single assistant, but as an army. When prototyping or brainstorming, open several different AI tools in parallel windows with similar prompts. This allows you to juggle and cross-pollinate ideas, effectively 'riffing' with multiple assistants at once to accelerate creative output and overcome latency.
