The Writers' Guild of America strike offers a sophisticated model for labor unions navigating AI. Instead of an outright ban, they negotiated a dual approach: winning protections against AI-driven displacement while also securing guarantees for their members to use AI as an assistive tool for their own benefit.
Related Insights
The best barometer for AI's enterprise value is not replacing the bottom 5% of workers. A better goal is empowering most employees to become 10x more productive. This reframes the AI conversation from a cost-cutting tool to a massive value-creation engine through human-AI partnership.
A copywriter initially feared AI would replace her. She then realized she could train AI agents to ensure brand consistency in all company communications—from sales to support. This transformed her role from a single contributor into a scaled brand governor with far greater impact.
New technologies perceived as job-destroying, like AI, face significant public and regulatory risk. A powerful defense is to make the general public owners of the technology. When people have a financial stake in a technology's success, they are far more likely to defend it than fight against it.
Rather than just replacing jobs, AI is fostering the emergence of new, specialized roles. The "Content Automation Strategist," for example, is a position that merges creative oversight with the technical skill to use AI for scaling content production and personalization effectively.
Treat advanced AI systems not as software with binary outcomes, but as a new employee with a unique persona. They can offer diverse, non-obvious insights and a different "chain of thought," sometimes finding issues even human experts miss and providing complementary perspectives.
When introducing AI automation in government, directly address job security fears. Frame AI not as a replacement, but as a partner that reduces overwhelming workloads and enables better service. Emphasize that adopting these new tools requires reskilling, shifting the focus to workforce evolution, not elimination.
Fears of AI-driven mass unemployment overlook basic capitalism. Any company that fires staff to boost margins will be out-competed by a rival that uses AI to empower its workforce for greater output and market share, ensuring AI augments jobs rather than eliminates them.
Contrary to fears of a forced, automated future, AI's greatest impact will be providing 'unparalleled optionality.' It allows individuals to automate tasks they dislike (like reordering groceries) while preserving the ability to manually perform tasks they enjoy (like strolling through a supermarket). It's a tool for personalization, not homogenization.
When AI automates a core task like content writing, don't eliminate the role. Instead, reframe it to leverage human judgment. A "content writer" can be transformed into a "content curator" who guides, edits, and validates AI-generated output. This shifts the focus from replacement to augmentation.
An unexpected side effect of replacing human managers with "faceless AI systems" is the rise of collective action. When gig workers and others are managed by impersonal algorithms, it fosters solidarity against a common, non-human adversary, leading them to form unions and activist groups to reclaim human agency.