A cultural shift towards top-down management, where engineers were no longer part of key decisions like moving to the cloud, led to a mass exodus of senior talent. When senior ICs cannot stand behind leadership's decisions, they lose the motivation to stay, even if the pay is good.

A leader focused solely on personal wins creates a toxic environment that ultimately leads to their own apathy and burnout. They become disconnected from the very machine they built, creating a job they personally loathe despite their apparent success.

When the pursuit of happiness feels unattainable, high performers may pivot to a duty-bound goal of being "useful." While this drives impact, it can sever the emotional connection to the work, leading to apathy where even significant achievements lose their meaning.

Instead of fostering long-term talent, some companies deliberately create high-pressure environments to extract maximum value from employees over a short period. They accept high turnover as a cost of business, constantly replacing burnt-out staff with new hires.

Setting rigid targets incentivizes employees to present favorable numbers, even subconsciously. This "performance theater" discourages them from investigating negative results, which are often the source of valuable learning. The muscle for detective work atrophies, and real problems remain hidden beneath good-looking metrics.

Leaders are often insulated from the daily operational friction their teams face. This creates an illusion that tasks are simple, leading to impatience and unrealistic demands. This dynamic drives away competent employees who understand the true complexity, creating a vicious cycle.

Before labeling a team as not resilient, leaders should first examine their own expectations. Often, what appears as a lack of resilience is a natural reaction to systemic issues like overwork, underpayment, and inadequate support, making it a leadership problem, not an employee one.

When leadership fails to translate strategy into clear, actionable priorities, employees are forced to react to what feels most urgent—the latest email or message. This creates a reactive work culture focused on clearing inboxes rather than proactively tackling the most impactful business goals.

Teams often self-limit output because they know overperformance will simply raise future targets to unsustainable levels. This "prison of expectations" incentivizes predictable mediocrity over breakthrough results, as employees actively manage goals to avoid future failure.