High-pressure "war rooms" can create focus but severely damage team morale if their duration is underestimated. Fiona Fung reflects that leaders must have deliberate conversations about the trade-offs and set realistic expectations for these intense periods.

Related Insights

Instead of relying on subjective feelings, managers can use concrete metrics to detect burnout. A rise in unplanned PTO and sick days is a strong leading indicator that a team is over-stressed and approaching a breaking point, serving as an early warning system.

To prevent burnout from constant AI model releases, GitHub's product leader treats his team like athletes who need rest for peak performance. This includes rotating high-stress roles, proactively increasing headcount, forcing focus on only the top three priorities, and enforcing recovery periods.

Juggling multiple roles requires moving beyond task management to actively managing mental capacity, or "cognitive load." This involves strategically delegating and letting go of responsibilities, even when ego makes it difficult, to focus on core strengths and prevent burnout.

Achieving extraordinary results requires extraordinary, often exhausting, effort. If your team ever finds themselves in their comfort zone at work, they are making a mistake. This high-intensity environment is easier to maintain when the company is clearly winning, providing leadership with "air cover" to demand more.

Unconstrained brainstorming often leads to an 'addition bias'—a pile-up of new initiatives without considering resources or removing existing tasks. This results in team burnout and inaction, as people become overwhelmed. Effective ideation must balance adding new ideas with subtracting old commitments.

Constant, raw speed leads to burnout. A more effective operational model uses "pace"—a sustainable level of high performance—and "intervals," which are targeted sprints for key initiatives. This approach allows an organization to maintain long-term momentum without exhausting its team.

Before labeling a team as not resilient, leaders should first examine their own expectations. Often, what appears as a lack of resilience is a natural reaction to systemic issues like overwork, underpayment, and inadequate support, making it a leadership problem, not an employee one.

Burnout stems not from long hours, but from a feeling of stagnation and lack of progress. The most effective way to prevent it is to ensure employees feel like they are 'winning.' This involves putting them in the right roles and creating an environment where they can consistently achieve tangible successes, which fuels motivation far more than work-life balance policies alone.

A key indicator of resilience is not just surviving a stressful period, like a major product launch, but how quickly the team can recover its energy afterward. This "restoration time" is as crucial as performance during the event itself and is directly dependent on the resilience built beforehand.

Focusing a team only on a distant, major goal is a recipe for burnout. Effective leaders reframe motivation to include celebrating the process: daily efforts, small successes, and skill development. The journey itself must provide fuel, with the motivation found in the effort, not just the outcome.