Howard Marks uses Warren Buffett's framework—'First, the innovator, then the imitator, then the idiot'—to describe the predictable lifecycle of investment trends. A strategy begins as a good idea for a few, gets copied by the masses, and eventually becomes an overcrowded, risky trade for latecomers.
Related Insights
Focusing only on trendy sectors leads to intense competition where the vast majority of startups fail. True opportunity lies in contrarian ideas that others overlook or dismiss, as these markets have fewer competitors.
The key to emulating professional investors isn't copying their trades but understanding their underlying strategies. Ackman uses concentration, Buffett waits for fear-driven discounts, and Wood bets on long-term innovation. Individual investors should focus on developing their own repeatable framework rather than simply following the moves of others.
Once a business trend like hiring 'storytellers' is covered in The Wall Street Journal, its competitive advantage, or 'alpha,' is gone. Mainstream recognition signifies peak saturation, meaning innovative companies should already be focused on the next non-obvious strategy to gain an edge.
During the dot-com bubble, Howard Marks used second-order thinking to stay rational. Instead of asking which tech stocks were innovative (a first-order question), he asked what would happen *after* everyone else piled in. This focus on embedded expectations, rather than simple quality, is key to avoiding overpriced, crowded trades.
In a technology boom like the AI trade, capital first flows to core enablers (e.g., NVIDIA). The cycle then extends to first-derivative plays (e.g., data center power) and then to riskier nth-derivative ideas (e.g., quantum computing), which act as leveraged bets and are the first to crash.
The most significant companies are often founded long before their sector becomes a "hot" investment theme. For example, OpenAI was founded in 2015, years before AI became a dominant VC trend. Early-stage investors should actively resist popular memes and cycles, as they are typically trailing indicators of innovation.
Analysis shows that the themes venture capitalists and media hype in any given year are significantly delayed. Breakout companies like OpenAI were founded years before their sector became a dominant trend, suggesting that investing in the current "hot" theme is a strategy for being late.
Marks emphasizes that he correctly identified the dot-com and subprime mortgage bubbles without being an expert in the underlying assets. His value came from observing the "folly" in investor behavior and the erosion of risk aversion, suggesting market psychology is more critical than domain knowledge for spotting bubbles.
Legendary growth investor T. Rowe Price shifted to inflation-resistant assets like real estate and gold when imitators bid up growth stock valuations to unsustainable levels. He demonstrated that even the best strategies must be adapted or temporarily shelved when they become overpopulated, only returning once the crowd had left.
Marks argues that speculative bubbles form around 'something new' where imagination is untethered from reality. The AI boom, like the dot-com era, is based on a novel, transformative technology. This differs from past manias centered on established companies (Nifty 50) or financial engineering (subprime mortgages), making it prone to similar flights of fancy.
