Legendary growth investor T. Rowe Price shifted to inflation-resistant assets like real estate and gold when imitators bid up growth stock valuations to unsustainable levels. He demonstrated that even the best strategies must be adapted or temporarily shelved when they become overpopulated, only returning once the crowd had left.

Related Insights

Fund managers are like zebras. Those in the middle (owning popular stocks) are safe from predators (getting fired), even if performance is mediocre. Those on the outside (owning unfamiliar stocks) find better grass (higher returns) but risk being the first ones eaten if an idea fails. This creates an institutional imperative to stay with the consensus.

Simply keeping pace with peers is not a valid measure of success. If peers are taking excessive risks in a bubble, matching their performance means you were equally foolish. True skill is outperforming in bad times while keeping pace in good times.

The key to emulating professional investors isn't copying their trades but understanding their underlying strategies. Ackman uses concentration, Buffett waits for fear-driven discounts, and Wood bets on long-term innovation. Individual investors should focus on developing their own repeatable framework rather than simply following the moves of others.

The dominant strategy of investing huge sums into companies believed to be generational outliers has a critical failure mode: it can destroy viable businesses. Not every market can absorb hyper-growth, and forcing capital into a 'pretty good' company can lead to churn, stalls, and ultimately, a ruined asset.

The most profitable periods for trend following occur when market trends extend far beyond what seems rational or fundamentally justified. The strategy is designed to stay disciplined as prices move to levels few can imagine, long after others have exited.

Students often believe their target industry is too crowded. Bravo counters this, recalling how a top PE head told him the industry was 'taken' in 1997. He argues the next generation can build bigger firms by ignoring such cyclical pessimism and focusing on execution.

Howard Marks offers a crucial corollary to Einstein's famous quote. For investors, the real insanity is failing to recognize a paradigm shift. Applying strategies that worked during 40 years of falling interest rates to the current, different environment is a recipe for failure. The context determines the outcome.

The dot-com bubble didn't create wealth in 1999; it destroyed it. Generational wealth came from buying and holding survivors like Amazon *after* its stock had fallen 95%. The winning strategy isn't timing the crash, but surviving it and holding quality assets through the long recovery.

Investors rarely sell a fund for outperforming its benchmark too aggressively, but they should consider it. Research by Vanguard's John Bogle tracked the top 20 funds of each decade and found they almost always became significant underperformers in the following decade, demonstrating the danger of chasing past winners.

Investors hesitant to buy assets like gold near all-time highs can use trend following for exposure. The strategy systematically enters prevailing trends and, crucially, provides a built-in, non-emotional exit signal when the trend reverses, mitigating timing risk.