Volaris and Viva can likely win regulatory approval for their merger by offering a political quid pro quo. By shifting capacity to the former president's underutilized, military-run Felipe Ángeles airport (AIFA), they allow the government to declare its controversial infrastructure project a success, creating a powerful non-economic incentive for approval.
Related Insights
As traditional economic-based antitrust enforcement weakens, a new gatekeeper for M&A has emerged: political cronyism. A deal's approval may now hinge less on market concentration analysis and more on a political leader’s personal sentiment towards the acquiring CEO, fundamentally changing the risk calculus for corporate strategists.
Despite attractive growth, new airlines struggle to enter the Mexican market due to the incumbents' scale. Volaris and Viva, controlling a large portion of domestic capacity, can strategically add flights and slash prices on any route a new entrant attempts to serve. This pricing power ensures any startup would be driven to bankruptcy within months.
When facing government pressure for deals that border on state capitalism, a single CEO gains little by taking a principled stand. Resisting alone will likely lead to their company being punished while competitors comply. The pragmatic move is to play along to ensure long-term survival, despite potential negative effects for the broader economy.
The primary growth driver for Mexican airlines like Volaris is not taking share from rivals, but converting travelers from the country's massive long-range bus industry. With 3 billion annual bus passengers, airlines tap a huge, underpenetrated market by offering a superior value proposition on a dollar-per-hour basis, fueling structural demand growth.
A proposed government service would allow companies to pay for a pre-vetted antitrust assessment before announcing a merger. This "TSA Pre-Check" for deals would involve independent reports and a public interest test, aiming to streamline the process, reduce political favoritism, and avoid lengthy, uncertain reviews.
The proposed merger combines Volaris's owner (Indigo Partners), which secures bulk discounts on Airbus orders, with Viva's owner, who also controls Mexico's largest bus conglomerate. This creates a powerful synergy: a low-cost fleet supplied by the ultimate customer acquisition funnel (the bus network), forming a unique and sustainable competitive moat.
A significant portion of both Volaris's and Viva's fleets are grounded due to a defect in Pratt & Whitney engines. While a financial drag, this has impacted both major low-cost carriers equally because they operate identical fleets. This symmetrical headwind prevents one from gaining a market share advantage while the other is capacity constrained.
Instead of seeking permission, Uber launched first to demonstrate its superior service. When regulators tried to shut them down, the company leveraged its loyal customer base to create overwhelming public and political pressure, effectively making users its most powerful lobby.
While competitors publicly blamed the FAA for delays, Zipline engaged the agency as a partner. They co-developed regulatory frameworks and flew officials to their Rwanda operation to demonstrate high safety standards. This partnership approach was key to securing critical flight approvals in the U.S.
In its hostile takeover bid for Warner Bros., Paramount's key pitch for regulatory approval stems from its financing. The deal is funded by Trump-allied figures like Larry Ellison, Jared Kushner, and Middle Eastern sovereign wealth funds, creating a belief that a potential Trump administration would favor their acquisition over Netflix's.
