Entrepreneurs rush to market with an MVP, often giving away the 20% of features that drive 80% of customer willingness to pay. They then spend time building the less valuable 80%, inadvertently training customers to expect more for less and making future monetization difficult.
Related Insights
Founders often mistakenly start with low-margin, mass-market products (the "save the whales" syndrome), which makes the business look damaged. A better strategy is to start at the high end with less price-sensitive customers. This builds a premium brand and generates the capital required to address the broader market later.
Founders often get stuck endlessly perfecting a product, believing it must be flawless before launch. This is a fallacy, as "perfection" is subjective. The correct approach is to launch early and iterate based on real market feedback, as there is no perfect time to start.
In early stages, the key to an effective product roadmap is ruthlessly prioritizing based on the severity of customer pain. A feature is only worth building if it solves an acute, costly problem. If customers aren't in enough pain to spend money and time, the idea is irrelevant for near-term revenue generation.
The "build it and they will come" mindset is a trap. Founders should treat marketing and brand-building not as a later-stage activity to be "turned on," but as a core muscle to be developed in parallel with the product from day one.
The obsession with lean methodology has created a market of low-quality, uninspiring software. In this environment, building a polished, considered, and beautiful end-to-end product is no longer a luxury but a true competitive advantage that stands out and inspires users.
Entrepreneurs often assume the product generating the most revenue is the most valuable. However, when factoring in the time and energy required for delivery (return on time), that "bestseller" might actually be the least profitable per hour, making it a poor candidate for scaling.
Founders embrace the MVP for their initial product but often abandon this lean approach for subsequent features, treating each new development as a major project requiring perfection. Maintaining high velocity requires applying an iterative, MVP-level approach to every single feature and launch, not just the first one.
To cut through MVP debates, apply a simple test: What is the problem? What is its cause? What solution addresses it? If you can remove a feature component and the core problem is still solved, it is not part of the MVP. If not, it is essential.
Releasing a minimum viable product isn't about cutting corners; it's a strategic choice. It validates the core idea, generates immediate revenue, and captures invaluable customer feedback, which is crucial for building a better second version.