Value-based flat fees should not just reflect the initial time estimate. As a business becomes more efficient and reduces the time required for a task, the flat fee should remain the same. This allows the business, not the client, to reap the financial reward of its accumulated experience.

Businesses invest heavily in recruiting top talent but then micromanage them, preventing them from using their full cognitive abilities. This creates a transactional environment where employees don't contribute their best ideas, leaving significant value unrealized.

As agencies adopt AI to increase efficiency, clients will rightfully question traditional pricing models based on billable hours. This creates an "arbitrage" problem, forcing agencies to redefine and justify their value based on strategic insight and outcomes, not just the labor involved.

Instead of fostering long-term talent, some companies deliberately create high-pressure environments to extract maximum value from employees over a short period. They accept high turnover as a cost of business, constantly replacing burnt-out staff with new hires.

VC Keith Rabois highlights a core conflict: law firms billing by the hour are disincentivized from adopting AI that makes associates more efficient, as it reduces revenue. This explains why corporate legal departments are faster adopters—their goal is to cut costs.

A creative director explains his failure at an agency where account directors were incentivized solely on account profitability. His high billable rate meant they actively prevented him from working on their accounts to protect their margins, making it impossible for him to do his job.

The free market is ruthlessly efficient at pushing commodity service providers to a point of burnout, where they give maximum effort for minimum sustainable pay. To escape burnout, you must escape commoditization by creating a unique, high-value offer.

Unlike law or accounting, marketing is a "fat-tailed" domain where a few big ideas generate most of the value, often for years. The shift to hourly billing is catastrophic because it rewards incremental effort, not the billion-dollar ideas that create lasting value but may have taken little time to conceive.

AI tools drastically reduce time for tasks traditionally billed by the hour. Clients, aware of these efficiencies, now demand law firms use AI and question hourly billing. This is forcing a non-optional industry shift towards alternative models like flat fees, driven by client pressure rather than firm strategy.