While most AI tools place the agent chat on the left, Cursor positions it on the right. This seemingly minor UI decision can dramatically improve user experience by aligning with natural right-hand bias and allowing the main screen area to be used for focused work, increasing adoption.
Related Insights
The terminology for AI tools (agent, co-pilot, engineer) is not just branding; it shapes user expectations. An "engineer" implies autonomous, asynchronous problem-solving, distinct from a "co-pilot" that assists or an "agent" that performs single-shot tasks. This positioning is critical for user adoption.
When building for AI-powered environments, design tools to be equally usable by humans and the AI model. An elegant, simple design for humans often translates directly into an effective tool for AI agents, simplifying development and promoting shared logic.
The primary interface for managing AI agents won't be simple chat, but sophisticated IDE-like environments for all knowledge workers. This paradigm of "macro delegation, micro-steering" will create new software categories like the "accountant IDE" or "lawyer IDE" for orchestrating complex AI work.
Instead of writing Python or TypeScript to prototype an AI agent, PM Dennis Yang writes a "super MVP" using plain English instructions directly in Cursor. He leverages Cursor's built-in agentic capabilities, model switching, and tool-calling to test the agent's logic and flow without writing a single line of code.
The best UI for an AI tool is a direct function of the underlying model's power. A more capable model unlocks more autonomous 'form factors.' For example, the sudden rise of CLI agents was only possible once models like Claude 3 became capable enough to reliably handle multi-step tasks.
The best agentic UX isn't a generic chat overlay. Instead, identify where users struggle with complex inputs like formulas or code. Replace these friction points with a native, natural language interface that directly integrates the AI into the core product workflow, making it feel seamless and powerful.
Open-ended prompts overwhelm new users who don't know what's possible. A better approach is to productize AI into specific features. Use familiar UI like sliders and dropdowns to gather user intent, which then constructs a complex prompt behind the scenes, making powerful AI accessible without requiring prompt engineering skills.
While chat works for human-AI interaction, the infinite canvas is a superior paradigm for multi-agent and human-AI collaboration. It allows for simultaneous, non-distracting parallel work, asynchronous handoffs, and persistent spatial context—all of which are difficult to achieve in a linear, turn-based chat interface.
Chatbots are fundamentally linear, which is ill-suited for complex tasks like planning a trip. The next generation of AI products will use AI as a co-creation tool within a more flexible canvas-like interface, allowing users to manipulate and organize AI-generated content non-linearly.
When exploring UI solutions, use a tool like Magic Patterns and its "Inspiration Mode" to generate multiple, distinct design approaches from a single prompt. By asking the AI to "think expansively and make each option differentiated," product managers can quickly explore a wide solution space and avoid getting stuck on a single initial idea.
