We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.
The power dynamic is shifting, with founders now conducting due diligence on VCs by asking their portfolio founders how they behaved during tough times. Investors who were unhelpful, absent, or pushed for unfavorable terms are developing a negative reputation that impacts their ability to win competitive deals.
In a bull market, it's hard to tell if a GP is skilled or just lucky. A downturn reveals their true discipline regarding valuations, capital deployment speed, and how they support founders through down rounds, providing LPs with robust underwriting data.
A venture capitalist's career security directly impacts the founder relationship. VCs with a proven track record (like Sequoia's Andrew Reed) act as supportive partners. In contrast, junior or less successful VCs often transfer pressure from their own partnerships onto the founder, creating a stressful and counterproductive dynamic.
In today's founder-centric climate, many VCs avoid confrontation to protect their reputation (NPS) within the founder network. This fear of being blacklisted leads them to abdicate their fiduciary duty to shareholders, failing to intervene even when a company's performance is dire and hard decisions are needed.
David Cohen of Techstars advises founders to request references from a VC's failed investments. This reveals how an investor behaves during difficult times, providing a more honest assessment of their character and support level than speaking only with successful founders.
In a hyper-competitive market, a VC's role isn't just to be supportive. Being an enabler who offers feel-good praise while ignoring competitive threats can lead to a 'death spiral.' The best board members are 'founder honest,' providing fact-based, clear-eyed analysis of the competitive landscape to force necessary action.
The recent wave of founders sharing negative stories about VCs is a cyclical trend tied to market conditions. In bull markets, founders have leverage and feel empowered to speak out. In bear markets, the focus shifts to survival, and public criticism subsides.
An estimated 60% of VCs harm their portfolio companies by pushing a 'burn at all costs' mentality or pretending to know how to run the business. The best VCs are humble connectors who link founders with people who have successfully navigated similar growth stages before.
Eric Byunn of Centana Growth advises founders to ask VCs how they would approach picking an investor if they were in the founder's position. This question is a powerful due diligence tool. Beyond providing substantive advice, the investor's response reveals their personality, approach, and ethics in navigating the inherent conflict of interest.
Sequoia's reputation for being brutally direct with founders is evolving into a high-status brand attribute. Ambitious founders are starting to prefer this 'stab you in the front' approach over unconditional support, viewing it as a necessary form of pressure to drive exceptional performance in a gladiatorial arena.
Reframe the pitch meeting from a judgment session to a mutual evaluation. Founders are selecting a partner for 7-10 years and must assess the investor for chemistry and fit, rather than just seeking capital from a position of need.