While rate cuts are expected, the bar for restarting large-scale asset purchases (QE) will be much higher under a Warsh-led Fed. His career-long opposition to balance sheet expansion means that the "Fed Put"—the market's expectation of a central bank backstop—will only be triggered by a significantly more severe financial crisis.
Related Insights
Fed nominee Kevin Warsh contends that the Federal Reserve's quantitative easing (QE) program indirectly encourages fiscal profligacy. By purchasing government bonds and keeping interest rates low, the Fed makes it easier for Congress to run large deficits, a practice Warsh believes the Fed should not accommodate.
Warsh advocates for a nuanced Fed policy: simultaneously cutting interest rates while passively shrinking the balance sheet by letting bonds mature. This "passive quantitative tightening" aims to reduce the Fed's market footprint without the shock of active selling, representing a middle ground between aggressive easing and hawkish tightening.
The post-Powell Fed is likely to reverse the QE playbook. The strategy will involve aggressive rate cuts to lower the cost of capital, combined with deregulation (like SLR exemptions) to incentivize commercial banks to take over money creation. This marks a fundamental shift from central bank-led liquidity to private sector-led credit expansion.
Kevin Warsh argues the Fed has experienced "scope creep" by taking on quantitative easing, broad bank regulation, and social initiatives. He advocates for a return to a narrow mandate focused on price stability, using interest rates as the primary tool and exiting non-conventional mechanisms.
Despite his reputation as an inflation hawk, Fed Chair nominee Kevin Warsh is arguing for lower interest rates. He claims a coming AI-driven productivity boom will be disinflationary, allowing for looser monetary policy. This stance strategically aligns with President Trump's desire for rate cuts, making his nomination politically palatable.
To secure a nomination from a president like Donald Trump, candidates like Kevin Warsh must publicly adopt positions, such as rate cuts, that contradict their hawkish history. This "audition process" creates fundamental uncertainty about their true policy direction once appointed.
A highly technical insight reveals Kevin Warsh favors returning to the pre-2008 monetary system of "scarce reserves." This would be a major operational change from the current "ample reserves" framework, requiring the Fed to actively manage daily liquidity and significantly shrink its balance sheet to exert policy discipline.
While presidents focus on interest rates, a Fed Chair like Kevin Warsh has limited sway as one of 12 votes. His real impact will be on technical areas like the Fed's balance sheet, where he has stronger personal convictions and faces less political scrutiny.
The Trump administration's desire for rate cuts is a given. Warsh's distinct, long-held agenda is to reduce the Fed's balance sheet. This reconciles his hawkish reputation with the dovish policy of cutting rates, a consensus view within the administration.
In crises like 2008 and 2020, the Fed's perceived independence allowed it to broker vital policy solutions between a divided government. Appointing a figure seen as highly partisan, like Kevin Warsh, risks destroying this institutional trust, potentially paralyzing the Fed's ability to act as a reliable crisis manager when it is needed most.
