Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

Ben Horowitz holds the contrarian view that CEOs cannot truly 'develop' their executives. Executives either possess the skills and autonomy to do the job or they don't. The CEO's primary role in team-building is to hire people who are already capable, not to coach them into the role.

Related Insights

Companies often complain about a lack of qualified candidates. The real issue is their failure to invest in developing the potential of hires who aren't 'perfect.' Talent development is a core organizational responsibility, not a luxury.

Delaying key hires to find the "perfect" candidate is a mistake. The best outcomes come from building a strong team around the founder early on, even if it requires calibration later. Waiting for ideal additions doesn't create better companies; early execution talent does.

Unlike a functional manager who can develop junior talent, a CEO lacks the domain expertise to coach their entire executive team (e.g., CFO, VP of HR). A CEO's time is better spent hiring world-class leaders who provide 'managerial leverage' by bringing new ideas and driving their function forward, rather than trying to fix people in roles they've never done.

The 'Founder Mode' concept, meant to encourage founders to reclaim decision-making, is often misinterpreted as a reason to avoid hiring senior executives. Ben Horowitz warns this is dangerous, as scaling functions like a global sales team requires deep experience that can't be learned on the founder's nickel.

Unlike a line manager who can train direct reports in a specific function, a CEO hires experts for roles they themselves cannot perform (e.g., CFO). A CEO's time spent trying to 'develop' an underperforming executive is a misallocation of their unique responsibilities, which are setting direction and making top-level decisions.

Venture capitalists' common advice to 'up-level the team' with outside executives often overlooks a better option. Parker Conrad argues that promoting homegrown leaders is 'really underrated.' They possess deep institutional knowledge and established trust, which significantly lowers the risk compared to external hires.

At Larroudé, the executive culture is "hands-on." Leaders are not just strategists who delegate; they must be able to execute tasks themselves. Furthermore, a critical hiring criterion for leadership is the ability to recruit, with the expectation that they can build out their own high-performing teams.

Hiring external executives is risky because the best talent is rarely looking for a job. A better strategy is to promote hungry internal candidates, even if they seem underqualified, and support them with rented expertise from executive coaches and advisors.

The most important job of a leader is team building. This means deliberately hiring functional experts who are better than the CEO in their specific fields. A company's success is a direct reflection of the team's collective talent, not the CEO's individual brilliance.

Leaders who complain their team isn't as good as them are misplacing blame. They are the ones who hired and trained those individuals. The team's failure is ultimately the leader's failure in either talent selection, skill development, or both, demanding radical ownership.

CEOs Can’t Develop Executives; They Must Hire for Existing Capability | RiffOn