James's concept of consciousness's "fringe" is shown via the tip-of-the-tongue phenomenon. The inability to recall a name isn't a void; it's an "empty" thought with a specific shape. We know immediately if a suggested name is wrong, proving that even a mental blank has a distinct, qualitative character.
Related Insights
This theory posits that our lives don't *create* subjective experiences (qualia). Instead, our lives are the emergent result of a fundamental consciousness cycling through a sequence of possible qualia, dictated by probabilistic, Markovian rules.
James argues that remembering your own past experience is fundamentally different from merely knowing another's. Your own memories are "suffused with a warmth and intimacy" that creates a direct, felt connection to your past self. This subjective quality is what constitutes personal identity over time.
Though not empirical in a modern sense, William James's introspective method is defended as valid psychological inquiry. Its power lies in articulating subjective experiences—like the feeling of a forgotten name—in a way that illuminates the reader's own inner life, similar to how a visual illusion works on everyone.
We don't just forget our thoughts; we forget that we've forgotten them. This cognitive bias, like an amnesiac shocked by his aging reflection, causes us to overvalue our current anxieties, failing to recognize they will likely fade into oblivion like countless thoughts before.
The mind wanders 50% of the time not by accident, but as an evolutionary feature. This "spontaneous thought" acts like a replay function, repeatedly firing neural patterns from recent experiences to strengthen their connections and embed them as long-term memories.
We vastly underestimate the volume of our own forgotten thoughts because, by definition, we can't recall what's been forgotten. This cognitive bug, the "forgetting paradox," means we should prioritize documenting ideas and not take any single thought too seriously, as most are ephemeral.
The inability to recall the perfect anecdote or fact in a high-pressure situation is not a memory failure. It is a mental "clench" that blocks the flow of information from your "library of experiences." The solution is counterintuitive: relax through focused breathing to unconstrict the mental funnel, allowing ideas to surface naturally.
A key tension in studying consciousness is identified. Cognitive science often starts atomistically, asking how disparate sensory inputs (color, shape) are "bound" together. This contrasts with William James's phenomenological claim that experience is *already* holistic, and that breaking it into components is an artificial, post-hoc analysis.
Lakhiani cites the Ganzfeld experiment, where people in sensory deprivation chambers identified images "sent" by others with 33% accuracy, significantly higher than the 25% probability of chance. This University of Edinburgh study suggests a subtle, unexplained form of information transfer between human minds.
Kevin Rose describes discovering he has aphantasia, a condition where one cannot voluntarily visualize mental images. For these individuals, abstract concepts and memories are experienced through feelings and kinesthetics rather than vivid pictures, highlighting vast, often unknown, differences in human cognition.
