Unlike military intelligence, the information needed for economic security—identifying strategic sectors and necessary actions—comes from businesses, researchers, and academia. Recognizing this, Japan's METI is building a global 'community' to ensure a flow of high-quality, real-world intelligence to inform its policies, as this expertise is not found inside government.
Related Insights
The concept of 'weaponized interdependence,' highlighted by China's use of export controls, is driving Asian nations like Japan, India, and South Korea to implement economic security acts. This shifts investment toward domestic supply chains in critical minerals, semiconductors, and defense, creating state-backed opportunities.
A METI official outlines a philosophy of 'peace through economic strength.' The objective is not to develop economic statecraft to weaken adversaries, but rather to enhance Japan's own technological superiority and supply chain autonomy. This strength, they believe, enables Japan to maintain better relationships and engage more freely in the global market.
The Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI) categorizes sectors to apply targeted policies. 'Green' areas have lost supply chain autonomy and require diversification. 'Blue' areas possess technological superiority and need control (e.g., export controls). 'Red' areas face disruptive innovation and demand proactive strategic investment.
The U.S. faces adversaries who are actively collaborating, rendering a siloed response insufficient. Victory requires an integrated effort combining the government, the traditional defense industrial base, and agile innovators, creating unique partnerships to move faster than the competition.
Under 'Sanae-nomics,' Japan's growth strategy is pivoting towards sectors linked to national security. This includes not only defense and heavy industries but also advanced technology like AI, robotics, and quantum computing, as well as energy and food security. These areas are expected to be core beneficiaries of the new administration's industrial policy.
In the public sector, the goal is not to outcompete rivals but to improve service delivery. A government CPO's version of competitive research involves talking to counterparts in other states, partnering with civic tech organizations, and learning from innovative vendors to understand best practices.
Temasek's partnership philosophy is not about risk diversification. Instead, it prioritizes collaborating with partners who can augment its internal capabilities and provide specific skill sets it lacks for a given opportunity. This makes partnership a strategic tool for capability building, not just capital sharing.
To gain corporate buy-in for its security agenda, Japan's government combines protective measures like export controls with promotional incentives like R&D support. This 'run faster' strategy reframes national security regulations from being a restrictive cost into a direct opportunity for innovation and expansion in strategic sectors.
Japan's Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI) defines its economic security strategy through two core pillars. 'Strategic indispensability' means possessing superior, leverageable technology that others need. 'Autonomy' refers to having resilient supply chains for critical goods like energy and food. This dual framework guides their national policy.
To prevent businesses from forgetting supply chain risks after a crisis subsides, Japan's METI employs a two-pronged approach. They use a 'bottom-up' method of continuously sharing case studies with operational teams and a 'top-down' strategy of urging CEOs and boards to integrate geopolitical risk into core business decisions, much like ESG standards.