To prevent businesses from forgetting supply chain risks after a crisis subsides, Japan's METI employs a two-pronged approach. They use a 'bottom-up' method of continuously sharing case studies with operational teams and a 'top-down' strategy of urging CEOs and boards to integrate geopolitical risk into core business decisions, much like ESG standards.
Related Insights
The move toward a less efficient, more expensive global supply chain is not a failure but a strategic correction. Over-prioritizing efficiency created a dangerous dependency on China. Diversification, while costlier in the short term, is a fundamental principle of long-term risk management.
By developing and owning the exact specifications for their fabrics—from the yarn to the finish—Faherty can move production between different manufacturers. This de-risks their supply chain from tariffs and geopolitical issues, as the "makers become less important."
Nestle avoids a rigid top-down approach by fostering a "hive mind" mentality. While a global strategy exists, local markets like Brazil and Mexico have autonomy to adapt to their unique cultures. The key is constant cross-market communication, where teams share successes and failures to ensure everyone evolves together.
A board member's role includes flagging strategic risks, including geopolitical exposure that could drastically limit future acquirers or prevent an IPO. Advising a CEO to relocate teams from a high-risk country is not operational meddling, but a core governance duty.
The Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI) categorizes sectors to apply targeted policies. 'Green' areas have lost supply chain autonomy and require diversification. 'Blue' areas possess technological superiority and need control (e.g., export controls). 'Red' areas face disruptive innovation and demand proactive strategic investment.
Unlike military intelligence, the information needed for economic security—identifying strategic sectors and necessary actions—comes from businesses, researchers, and academia. Recognizing this, Japan's METI is building a global 'community' to ensure a flow of high-quality, real-world intelligence to inform its policies, as this expertise is not found inside government.
To gain corporate buy-in for its security agenda, Japan's government combines protective measures like export controls with promotional incentives like R&D support. This 'run faster' strategy reframes national security regulations from being a restrictive cost into a direct opportunity for innovation and expansion in strategic sectors.
Japan's Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI) defines its economic security strategy through two core pillars. 'Strategic indispensability' means possessing superior, leverageable technology that others need. 'Autonomy' refers to having resilient supply chains for critical goods like energy and food. This dual framework guides their national policy.
Anticipating that independence from China will be a long-term, bipartisan US policy goal, Rivian intentionally designed its new R2 supply chain to be U.S.-centric. This strategic planning aims to align the business with persistent geopolitical trends, rather than just reacting to current tariffs.
Instead of merely reacting to supply chain disruptions, AI allows companies to become proactive. It can model scenarios involving labor shortages, tariffs, and weather to reroute shipments and adjust inventory promises on websites in real-time, moving from crisis management to strategic orchestration.
