Intense, chaotic, or euphoric feelings in a new relationship are often misinterpreted as deep "chemistry" or love. In reality, this intensity can be a sign that one's nervous system recognizes a familiar, and potentially unhealthy, dynamic from the past. True, safe intimacy is often calmer and less dramatic.
Related Insights
Relationship satisfaction can be improved with small cognitive shifts called "love hacks." These involve changing one's internal narrative rather than external realities, such as adopting a "growth mindset" about compatibility or reinterpreting a partner's negative behavior more charitably (e.g., as situational rather than characterological).
Deep connection relies on a shared “fun age”—a mutual understanding of what constitutes play and enjoyment. Whether it’s childlike pranks or quiet domesticity, having compatible fun ages allows partners to cultivate both levity and gravity, which is essential for long-term relational health.
Deep intimacy is not a passive state but an active skill that requires practice. Difficult emotional work, like apologizing first, will feel clumsy initially, just like learning an instrument. Gracefulness and effectiveness only come through consistent repetition and treating it as a formal practice.
Our nervous system is wired to gravitate towards familiar patterns, confusing them with safety. This is why people unconsciously recreate painful or traumatic childhood dynamics in adult relationships. It is a biological pull toward the known, not a conscious desire for pain, making it a cosmically unfair default setting.
For someone accustomed to relational chaos, a genuinely safe and present partner can feel deeply uncomfortable. True safety requires vulnerability, which can trigger protective mechanisms in someone who has used intensity and workaholism to avoid their inner world. Calmness can feel foreign and threatening.
Relationships don't start in earnest until the initial fantasy shatters. This 'crisis of disappointment' happens when partners see each other realistically for the first time, flaws and all. Only after this moment can a genuine connection be built on who the person actually is, rather than on an idealized projection.
In a world hyper-optimized for convenience and efficiency, true romance is a disruptive force. It defies schedules, logic, and productivity. If a relationship fits perfectly into a pre-planned life without causing any friction or spontaneity, it may be lacking the essential, inconvenient spark of passion.
Conflict avoidance is not a sign of a healthy relationship. True intimacy is built through cycles of 'rupture and repair,' where disagreements are used as opportunities for deeper understanding. A relationship without conflict may be fragile, as its ability to repair has never been tested.
To heal a relational wound, one must revisit the original feeling within a new, safe relationship. The healing occurs when this context provides a "disconfirming experience"—a different, positive outcome that meets the original unmet need and neurologically rewrites the pattern.
Couples in conflict often appear to be poor communicators. However, studies show these same individuals communicate effectively with strangers. The issue isn't a skill deficit, but a toxic emotional environment within the relationship that inhibits their willingness to collaborate.
