A visually basic website can generate massive revenue if the user experience (UX) is flawless. Focus on clarity of messaging, value props, and social proof first. Aesthetics (UI) are secondary; a pretty site that confuses users won't convert. UX is for the customer, UI is for you.

Related Insights

Reducing the number of clicks is a misguided metric. A process with eight trivially easy clicks is better than one with two fraught, confusing decisions. Each decision burns cognitive energy and risks making the user feel stupid. The ultimate design goal should be to prevent users from having to think.

Most designers focus on aesthetics (UI) or general usability. High-growth DTC requires a specialist who understands performance marketing, UX, messaging hierarchy, and customer psychology to design assets that directly drive revenue, not just look good. This is a rare and critical skillset.

The obsession with removing friction is often wrong. When users have low intent or understanding, the goal isn't to speed them up but to build their comprehension of your product's value. If software asks you to make a decision you don't understand, it makes you feel stupid, which is the ultimate failure.

While you obsess over perfecting fonts and branding, your ideal client is desperately searching for a solution to an urgent problem. They care about fixing their issue—whether it's saving their marriage or growing revenue—not about the aesthetic perfection of your website. Focus on solving the problem, not on achieving a flawless presentation.

Instead of focusing solely on conversion rates, measure 'engagement quality'—metrics that signal user confidence, like dwell time, scroll depth, and journey progression. The philosophy is that if you successfully help users understand the content and feel confident, conversions will naturally follow as a positive side effect.

Product teams often use placeholder text and duplicate UI components, but users don't provide good feedback on unrealistic designs. A prototype with authentic, varied content—even if the UI is simpler—will elicit far more valuable user feedback because it feels real.

Product 'taste' is often narrowly defined as aesthetics. A better analogy is a restaurant: great food (visuals) is necessary but not sufficient. Taste encompasses the entire end-to-end user journey, from being greeted at the door to paying the check. Every interaction must feel crafted and delightful.

Don't design solely for the user. The best product opportunities lie at the nexus of what users truly need (not what they say they want), the company's established product principles, and its core business objectives.

When products offer too many configurations, it often signals that leaders lack the conviction to make a decision. This fear of being wrong creates a confusing user experience. It's better to ship a simple, opinionated product, learn from being wrong, and then adjust, rather than shipping a convoluted experience.

Robinhood's superior user experience isn't just the design team's responsibility; it's a core part of the company's DNA, driven by leadership. The CEO and VPs spend significant time on design details, ensuring a high bar for polish that competitors often neglect.