Figure chose to develop its AI systems in-house rather than rely on its partnership with OpenAI. The reason was that its own team proved superior at the highly specialized task of designing, embedding, and running models on physical robot hardware, a challenge distinct from training purely digital LLMs.
Related Insights
Unlike cloud-reliant AI, Figure's humanoids perform all computations onboard. This is a critical architectural choice to enable high-frequency (200Hz+) control loops for balance and manipulation, ensuring the robot remains fully functional and responsive without depending on Wi-Fi or 5G connectivity.
By acquiring robotics company Pollen, Hugging Face is creating an open-source hardware and software ecosystem. This serves as a critical competitive check against the closed, proprietary humanoid robot platforms being developed by giants like Tesla and Figure, preventing a single entity from monopolizing the future of robotics.
The key for enterprises isn't integrating general AI like ChatGPT but creating "proprietary intelligence." This involves fine-tuning smaller, custom models on their unique internal data and workflows, creating a competitive moat that off-the-shelf solutions cannot replicate.
The partnership where OpenAI becomes an equity holder in Thrive Holdings suggests a new go-to-market model. Instead of tech firms pushing general AI 'outside-in,' this 'inside-out' approach embeds AI development within established industry operators to build, test, and improve domain-specific models with real-world feedback loops.
GM's new robotics division is leveraging a non-obvious asset: its vast, meticulously structured manufacturing data. Detailed CAD models, material properties, and step-by-step assembly instructions for every vehicle provide a unique and proprietary dataset for training highly competent 'embodied AI' systems, creating a significant competitive moat in industrial automation.
Microsoft’s new superintelligence team is a direct result of a renegotiated OpenAI deal. The previous contract restricted Microsoft from building AGI past a certain computational threshold. Removing this clause was a pivotal, strategic move to pursue AI self-sufficiency.
The choice between open and closed-source AI is not just technical but strategic. For startups, feeding proprietary data to a closed-source provider like OpenAI, which competes across many verticals, creates long-term risk. Open-source models offer "strategic autonomy" and prevent dependency on a potential future rival.
Initially, even OpenAI believed a single, ultimate 'model to rule them all' would emerge. This thinking has completely changed to favor a proliferation of specialized models, creating a healthier, less winner-take-all ecosystem where different models serve different needs.
To escape platform risk and high API costs, startups are building their own AI models. The strategy involves taking powerful, state-subsidized open-source models from China and fine-tuning them for specific use cases, creating a competitive alternative to relying on APIs from OpenAI or Anthropic.
General-purpose robotics lacks standardized interfaces between hardware, data, and AI. This makes a full-stack, in-house approach essential because the definition of 'good' for each component is constantly co-evolving. Partnering is difficult when your standard of quality is a moving target.
