Director Jacob Tierney’s philosophy opposes the top-down, "brilliant man" approach. He avoids endless takes in a cruel pursuit of perfection, instead preferring to be surprised by actors' contributions. This creates a more humane and creatively fertile environment that yields unexpected, authentic performances.
Related Insights
True creative collaboration requires honest feedback, not sycophancy. The ultimate test of a potential collaborator is their willingness to give critical feedback when it's riskiest for them—like during a job interview. This signals they value the work's integrity over simply getting the job.
Perfectionism creates a paralyzing binary of success or failure. Musician Jeff Tweedy combats this by deliberately trying to produce bad material first. This removes the pressure for quality, increases quantity, and clears the mental space for more creative ideas to emerge.
Jacob Collier explains that beautiful music relies on controlling dissonance (tension), not just playing pleasant notes (consonance). This applies to teams: leaning into creative tension and resolving it leads to a more meaningful outcome than avoiding disagreement altogether.
O'Leary didn't just read his lines; he inhabited his character. He successfully pushed back on the script, including the ending, by convincingly arguing how his character would realistically think and behave. This collaborative approach allowed him to embody the character rather than just act.
Deadlines weed out extraneous details and prevent the quest for perfection. They force decisive action, which, as leaders like Ed Catmull and Christopher Nolan have found, can accelerate the creative process rather than hinder it, forcing you to make something different, not just perfect.
To encourage participation from everyone, leaders should focus on the 'why' behind an idea (intention) and ask curious questions rather than judging the final output. This levels the playing field by rewarding effort and thoughtfulness over innate talent, making it safe for people to share imperfect ideas.
The producer argues against the tech industry's obsession with seamless tools. He believes the moments of friction in the creative process—when collaborators struggle to align on an idea—are essential for achieving a shared vision. This human element of misunderstanding and resolution is difficult for AI to replicate.
Vaynerchuk treats creative sessions like live performances, actively monitoring collaborators' facial expressions and reactions. A gasp of surprise or a look of confusion provides immediate, invaluable feedback that directly shapes the narrative's direction.
While many creatives dread repetitive takes, Helms sees each one as a new opportunity to explore and refine a performance. He actively asks for more takes to experiment with nuances, transforming a potentially tedious process into a "thrill" of pursuing unattainable perfection.
When working privately, don't label early attempts as successes or failures. Instead, choreographer Twyla Tharp suggests evaluating them based on their utility. The crucial question is not "Is this good?" but "Is this useful? Does it generate the next question and move the process forward?"
