Pixar's 'no hedging' culture was supported by a rigorous prototyping process. Directors created 'story reels' (moving comic strips) of the entire film 3-4 times a year. This forced rapid iteration and feedback from the studio's 'brain trust,' ensuring quality improved dramatically before full production.
Related Insights
The founders resolve the tension between speed and quality by being "obsessive." They move fast by iterating constantly, but also relentlessly go back and refine existing work. Speed is about the pace of iteration and a commitment to delight, not about shipping once and moving on.
Creativity thrives not from pressure, but from a culture of psychological safety where experimentation is encouraged. Great thinkers often need to "sit on" a brief for weeks to let ideas incubate. Forcing immediate output stifles breakthrough campaign thinking.
Instead of starting with a blank slate, Nike's team prototypes new ideas by physically cutting and modifying existing products. This "cobbling" method enables rapid, low-cost testing of core concepts before investing in new designs and expensive molds, allowing them to fail fast and forward.
For ambitious 'moonshot' projects, the vast majority of time and effort (90%) is spent on learning, exploration, and discovering the right thing to build. The actual construction is a small fraction (10%) of the total work. This reframes failure as a critical and expected part of the learning process.
Unlike studios that hedge with a slate of films, Pixar committed 100% to one director's passionate vision at a time. This 'all-in' mentality, where the studio's future depended on each project, was the foundation of its repeatable greatness and forced every film to be a success.
Non-technical founders using AI tools must unlearn traditional project planning. The key is rapid iteration: building a first version you know you will discard. This mindset leverages the AI's speed, making it emotionally easier to pivot and refine ideas without the sunk cost fallacy of wasting developer time.
Historically, resource-intensive prototyping (requiring designers and tools like Figma) was reserved for major features. AI tools reduce prototype creation time to minutes, allowing PMs to de-risk even minor features with user testing and solution discovery, improving the entire product's success rate.
A prototype-first culture, accelerated by AI tools, allows teams to surface and resolve design and workflow conflicts early. At Webflow, designers were asked to 'harmonize' their separate prototypes, preventing a costly integration problem that would have been much harder to fix later in the development cycle.
Diller’s process for navigating the unknown isn't about brilliance but relentless iteration. He describes it as taking "one dumb step" at a time, bouncing off the walls of bad ideas and mistakes, and course-correcting. This embraces looking foolish as a prerequisite for finding the right path.
A powerful but unintuitive AI development pattern is to give a model a vague goal and let it attempt a full implementation. This "throwaway" draft, with its mistakes and unexpected choices, provides crucial insights for writing a much more accurate plan for the final version.
