The founders resolve the tension between speed and quality by being "obsessive." They move fast by iterating constantly, but also relentlessly go back and refine existing work. Speed is about the pace of iteration and a commitment to delight, not about shipping once and moving on.
Related Insights
The belief that your current product is "a giant piece of shit" is a powerful motivator. This mindset ensures you are constantly seeking limitless opportunities for improvement. If you can't see flaws and feel a degree of humiliation about what you offer the public, you shouldn't be designing the product.
Contradicting the common startup goal of scaling headcount, the founders now actively question how small they can keep their team. They see a direct link between adding people, increasing process, and slowing down, leveraging a small, elite team as a core part of their high-velocity strategy.
Top product builders are driven by a constant dissatisfaction with the status quo. This mindset, described by Google's VP of Product Robbie Stein, isn't negative but is a relentless force that pushes them to question everything and continuously make products better for users.
The obsession with lean methodology has created a market of low-quality, uninspiring software. In this environment, building a polished, considered, and beautiful end-to-end product is no longer a luxury but a true competitive advantage that stands out and inspires users.
The team avoids traditional design reviews and handoffs, fostering a "process-allergic" culture where everyone obsessively builds and iterates directly on the product. This chaotic but passionate approach is key to their speed and quality, allowing them to move fast, make mistakes, and fix them quickly.
Instead of over-analyzing and philosophizing about process improvements, simply force the team to increase its cadence and ship faster. This discomfort forces quicker, more natural problem-solving, causing many underlying inefficiencies to self-correct without needing a formal change initiative.
Despite user requests, Supercut is holding back on building a traditional video editor. They believe it would become an "excuse" for their AI-powered "auto edit" to be mediocre. This strategic constraint forces them to perfect their core differentiator before adding table-stakes features.
The founders avoid creating a rigid, atomized design system because the product is still iterating too quickly. They accept a "messy" component library and technical debt as a trade-off for speed. Formalizing a design system only makes sense once the product's UI has stabilized.