Every 10 days the Strait of Hormuz is closed, a 200-million-barrel physical gap is created in the global oil flow. This is not a temporary kink but a massive hole in the supply chain that will take months to resolve and normalize, even long after transit resumes.

The 20 million barrels of oil flowing daily through the Strait of Hormuz represent 20% of global supply. A blockade constitutes a disruption four times larger than the Iranian Revolution or Yom Kippur War embargoes, with no simple replacement.

Despite the absence of a real surplus, oil prices are unlikely to surge. China has built massive strategic reserves and consistently sells from them when Brent crude moves above $70 per barrel. This acts as a ceiling on the market, creating a range-bound environment for prices in the $60s.

Despite healthy global oil demand, J.P. Morgan maintains a bearish outlook because supply is forecast to expand at three times the rate of demand. This oversupply creates such a large market imbalance that prices must fall to enforce production cuts and rebalance the market.

The oil market's lack of reaction to the events in Venezuela demonstrates a key principle: short-to-medium term prices are driven by current production and delivery capacity, not the theoretical size of underground reserves that may take years and billions to develop.

Major historical oil price movements were triggered by supply-demand imbalances of just 2-3 million barrels per day. A disruption at the Strait of Hormuz would impact 20 million barrels daily, a scale that dwarfs previous crises and renders standard analytical models inadequate.

While many fear production shutdowns, a more significant and probable risk is a logistical shock from shipping disruptions. Even modest delays in tanker transit times could effectively remove millions of barrels per day from the market, causing a significant price spike without a single well being shut down.

China's strategy of building oil inventories provides a key balancing force in the market. During periods of temporary supply disruption and high prices, China can simply slow its stock building. This reduction in purchasing effectively cuts demand and helps offset the disruption, stabilizing prices more quickly.

The conflict's primary impact on oil is not that supply is offline, but that its transport through the Strait of Hormuz is blocked. This distinction is key to understanding price scenarios, as supply exists but cannot be delivered.