In a bull market, it's hard to tell if a GP is skilled or just lucky. A downturn reveals their true discipline regarding valuations, capital deployment speed, and how they support founders through down rounds, providing LPs with robust underwriting data.

Simply keeping pace with peers is not a valid measure of success. If peers are taking excessive risks in a bubble, matching their performance means you were equally foolish. True skill is outperforming in bad times while keeping pace in good times.

In a rising market, the investors taking the most risk generate the highest returns, making them appear brilliant. However, this same aggression ensures they will be hurt the most when the market turns. This dynamic creates a powerful incentive to increase risk-taking, often just before a downturn.

Underperforming VC firms persist because the 7-10+ year feedback loop for returns allows them to raise multiple funds before performance is clear. Additionally, most LPs struggle to distinguish between a manager's true investment skill and market-driven luck.

During periods of intense market euphoria, investors with experience of past downturns are at a disadvantage. Their knowledge of how bubbles burst makes them cautious, causing them to underperform those who have only seen markets rebound, reinforcing a dangerous cycle of overconfidence.

A long bull market can produce a generation of venture capitalists who have never experienced a downturn. This lack of cyclical perspective leads to flawed investment heuristics, such as ignoring valuation discipline, which are then painfully corrected when the market inevitably turns.

Beyond a strong thesis, Limited Partners (LPs) critically evaluate how crypto fund managers understand and adapt to crypto's four-year bull/bear cycles. A manager's ability to strategically time the market—knowing when to be aggressive versus when to take profits—is a key filter for LPs allocating capital in the space.

Judging investment skill requires observing performance through both bull and bear markets. A fixed period, like 5 or 10 years, can be misleading if it only captures one type of environment, often rewarding mere risk tolerance rather than genuine ability.

A staggering 70% of private credit managers have less than a decade of experience, meaning their entire careers have been in a low-rate, bull market environment. This lack of cycle-tested experience poses a significant systemic risk as market conditions normalize and stress appears.