Success brings knowledge, but it also creates a bias against trying unconventional ideas. Early-stage entrepreneurs are "too dumb to know it was dumb," allowing them to take random shots with high upside. Experienced founders often filter these out, potentially missing breakthroughs, fun, and valuable memories.

Jeff Aronson warns that prolonged success breeds dangerous overconfidence. When an investor is on a hot streak and feels they can do no wrong, their perception of risk becomes warped. This psychological shift, where they think "I must be good," is precisely when underlying risk is escalating, not diminishing.

Entrepreneurs who thrived during past downturns (like 2008) often become complacent. With higher overhead and a more comfortable lifestyle, they are less willing to do the hard, uncomfortable work required to win in a new down market, creating an opportunity for hungrier competitors.

True investment prowess isn't complex strategies; it's emotional discipline. Citing Napoleon, the ability to simply do the average thing—like not panic selling—when everyone else is losing their mind is what defines top-tier performance. Behavioral fortitude during a crisis is the ultimate financial advantage.

A surge in highly speculative assets may not indicate a strong economy. It can be a sign that people feel so far behind financially that they're placing huge bets, believing in an "only up" market out of desperation rather than confidence.

Phenomena like bank runs or speculative bubbles are often rational responses to perceived common knowledge. People act not on an asset's fundamental value, but on their prediction of how others will act, who are in turn predicting others' actions. This creates self-fulfilling prophecies.

Every investment decision feels uniquely difficult in the present moment due to prevailing uncertainties. This mental model reminds investors that what seems obvious in hindsight (like buying in 2009) was fraught with risk at the time, helping to counter behavioral biases and the illusion of past clarity.

Contrary to popular belief, the 1929 crash wasn't an instantaneous event. It took a full year for public confidence to erode and for the new reality to set in. This illustrates that markets can absorb financial shocks, but they cannot withstand a sustained, spiraling loss of confidence.

Contrary to intuition, widespread fear and discussion of a market bubble often precede a final, insane surge upward. The real crash tends to happen later, when the consensus shifts to believing in a 'new economic model.' This highlights a key psychological dynamic of market cycles where peak anxiety doesn't signal an immediate top.